Wealth and Investing Center

Analysis: Stagflation, 70s icon, dusts off disco shoes

Related Topics

Models chat on stage during a presentation of the design label Rock & Republic's Spring 2008 collection at New York Fashion Week, September 5, 2007. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Models chat on stage during a presentation of the design label Rock & Republic's Spring 2008 collection at New York Fashion Week, September 5, 2007.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

NEW YORK | Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:49pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Nostalgia buffs of the 1970s should invest in vintage economic textbooks because stagflation may be the next retro-trend to make a comeback in the United States.

Soaring oil prices have raised concerns the economy could see a repeat of problems that marred the disco era, when inflation soared, the economy slowed and unemployment was high.

Indeed, some bond investors are showing signs of alarm. U.S. government bonds that offer protection from price growth now reflect the highest inflation expectations in around two and a half years.

"I hate to mention the word stagflation, but that seems to be what fears are out there at the moment," said Martin Hegarty, who co-heads the management of about $22 billion in global inflation-linked portfolios for BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager.

Hegarty sees inflation concerns as contained for now, though the rise in oil is threatening momentum in the economic recovery at the same time as a number of other economic headwinds are threatening the rosy outlook.

Some investors already feared an economic slowdown as the Federal Reserve approaches the end of its bond-buying stimulus program and U.S. federal and state governments come under increasing pressure to reduce spending.

The effect of higher oil costs on inflation, if sustained, could go either way. Higher costs could hurt consumer spending, bringing inflation down over the medium term. Or commodity prices could lead to general price increases.

So far, "I think the market is viewing this move in oil as more of a stagflationary tax. It's not going to result in inflation expectations becoming embedded in psychology, and the inflation genie is not going to get out of the bottle," said Hegarty.

Indeed, U.S. consumer price inflation is currently less than 2 percent, well below the levels of 1974, when it rose above 12 percent.

INFLATION EXPECTATIONS RISING

Signs are starting to emerge, however, that the market could be facing longer-term risks, and some fear the Fed will be too slow to respond.

So-called breakevens on 10-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, which measure inflation expectations, rose as high as 257 basis points this week, their highest level since July 2008 and only 30 basis points shy of their all time high in 2005.

Forward contracts that measure market expectations of where five-year inflation will stand in five years, the Fed's favorite market inflation indicator, also increased by around 20 basis points to 280 basis points in less than two weeks.

"It would seem that the Treasury market is more worried about the Fed being too loose, too long," said Bob Gahagan, head of the taxable bond group at American Century Investments, who manages $21 billion in taxable bond assets.

"There is a risk of a stagflation environment, not stagflation like the 70s, but just very low subpar growth with inflation higher than the Fed's target," he said. "That would be very much a dilemma for policymakers. That's one risk that we're watching for."

JUST THE WAY IT IS

The trend may be global as some say other economies, including in the United Kingdom and Asia, are already stagflating.

"Stagflation is just the way it is," with low labor productivity, which may decline further, said Dominic Konstam, global head of rates research at Deutsche Bank in New York.

"The fact is we're now in a world where if you want to get lots of growth, you're going to have to pay the price in inflation, which means in the end that you're going to have to run the economy slower than otherwise," Konstam said.

"I don't think the market's fully adjusted to that, and I don't think the Fed's fully adjusted to that," he added.

The Fed could be forced to act, however, if a strong and sustained rise in inflation-linked bonds show that investors think inflation will get out of control.

"Inflation expectations are increasing, and that could very well put pressure on the Fed to give a signal of higher rates," or to talk of an exit strategy from its stimulus program, said American Century's Gahagan.

That would pose a dilemma for the central bank as it tries to balance its mandate to reduce unemployment and control high prices, or face an oily slide back to the decade of big hair, flared jeans and gas lines.

(Editing by Padraic Cassidy)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
NukerDoggie wrote:
Well, the Fed has explicitly made the creation of higher inflation the centerpiece of its monetary policy. That’s not just my opinion. That’s a fact. To achieve its goal, it buys bonds under the QE2 policy. And that policy weakens the dollar, stirring up some inflation. Well, just when the Fed embarks upon its inflation-creation scheme, commodities skyrocket into a new bubble and then the Middle East blows up, sending oil skyward. Does anyone else out there feel sick like I do, wondering if Ben BurnYankey has got absolutely the WORST timing in history? I mean, ‘let’s create some inflation while oil and commodities go out-of-control’. Then, let’s assure everyone (including ourselves) that we still have control of the inflation monster. I don’t think so, Benny! You’re pumping life into the monster, who’s feeding on oil and who’ll crush you like a wet grape as soon as you even think about trying to stomp it out with higher interest rates. The weakling U.S. economy can’t tolerate ANY hike in interest rates for the foreseeable future. It’ll plunge into recession if you try to hike rates. Benny’s pushing the economy into the worse catch-22 imaginable. Stagflation.

Mar 11, 2011 4:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Ananke wrote:
Fed cannot do anything anymore. It is only SEC that can mandate mandatory closing of all commodity contracts and further trade with zero leverage and mandatory delivery, i.e. no financial trades on the commodity market. Many investors will burn though…but it is better than endless stagflation and wars eventually.

Mar 11, 2011 9:03pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Fishrl wrote:
We didn’t learn anything in the 70s. We have no cogent energy policy. If we had started taking serious measures to curb our oil dependence then, no one would be worrying about oil shocks.

Mar 11, 2011 10:16pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.