French greens call for end to nuclear energy

PARIS Sat Mar 12, 2011 11:35am EST

PARIS (Reuters) - French green groups renewed a call on Saturday for France to end its dependence on nuclear power, saying a radiation leak at a Japanese atomic power plant showed there were no safety guarantees in the industry.

The Japanese Daiichi 1 facility north of Tokyo started leaking radiation after an explosion blew the roof off the plant that had been shaken in a massive earthquake on Friday, raising fears of a meltdown.

French officials were due to meet to discuss the situation and possible precautionary measures, but green groups said it was time to dump a technology that had led to the worst civilian nuclear disaster in Chernobyl in 1986.

"It's clear that when there's a significant natural disaster, all the so-called safety measures fail in a country with the highest level of technical know-how," Cecile Duflot, head of the green Europe Ecologie-Les Verts party, told Reuters.

"The nuclear risk is not a risk that can really be controlled."

France has 58 nuclear reactors spread over 19 sites, providing almost four-fifths of the country's electricity and making it the second-biggest nuclear country after the United States. Japan has 55 nuclear reactors.

French anti-nuclear network "Sortir du nucleaire" described Japan's stricken nuclear plant as a "new Chernobyl."

"This is indeed a very serious nuclear accident that is currently taking place in Japan, of a severity comparable to that of Three Mile Island and that of Chernobyl, which took place just about 25 years ago," the group said in a statement.

Chernobyl exploded in 1986, spewing out clouds of radioactivity. Human and technical error caused a confused response at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania, leading to a meltdown of the core and a write-off of the reactor in 1979.

Japan's nuclear safety agency said they rated the incident as less serious than both accidents. [nTKZ00680]

Nuclear experts also said the explosion at the Japanese reactor should not reach the magnitude of Chernobyl because the reactor's core seemed to be intact.

But Greenpeace said the situation was "more and more alarming."

"An explosion in one reactor could already have released very high doses of radioactivity, and other reactors also seem to be in a critical situation," Greenpeace said in a statement.

France's ASN nuclear safety authority said it was stepping up the monitoring of air quality over France.

The president of the IRSN radiation protection and nuclear safety institution, Agnes Buzyn, told a news conference that real-time data on air quality would be made available to reassure the public.

Buzyn and ASN President Andre-Claude Lacoste were due to meet Ecology Minister Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet, Energy Minister Eric Besson and top executives from nuclear reactor maker Areva and power giant EDF at the ecology ministry later on Saturday.

(Additional reporting by Matthias Blamont; editing by Elizabeth Piper)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
UptheRiver wrote:
The amount of energy released in this earthquake is enormous. Nothing would be spared. Hydro dams would collapse, steam explosions at of power generating facilities, solar facilities would be a toxic waste land. No facility on earth is designed for this amount of energy release by mother earth.
Nuclear is arguably safer than hydro in this situation.

Mar 12, 2011 12:20pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Really? The french green groups think that the reactor incidents are on the same scale? That really makes me sad for the state of France. clearly no Nobels of science are going to be coming out of there.

Chernobyl was caused by insufficient Soviet design of fuel rods coupled with a crappy coolant system (with little or no backups). Japan’s coolants have been designed with enough backups and containment systems to keep it from a total meltdown.

Who’s to say that alternative energy technology aside from Nuclear development couldn’t do the same thing? Chernobyl was caused by poor designing and engineering practices. IF YOU DO THE SAME THING WITH ANY ENERGY SOURCE, YOU CAN HAVE THE SAME EFFECT. Your environmentally unfriendly wind turbines (ask bird researchers about that) could come undone and destroy any buildings in the area. Your hydroelectric dams could break due to poor design and cause downstream flooding, wiping out cities.

Everyone sharing this with your friends: Shame on you for spreading misinformation. You’re giving attention seeking activists more power and control using lies and deception.

Mar 12, 2011 1:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Keertikesh wrote:
Calling end to Nuclear energy alone will not guarantee the safety. Even Air travel has risks associated and we are not going stop using planes. The fossil fuel like Oil , natural gas & coal has done immense damage to the nature and earth and is still not being opposed. People need to understand that all the industry that we have today have risk. You need to carry out risk-benefit analysis where Nuclear energy will definitely stand to be a good option for meeting today’s electricity needs unless we find a very efficient & cost effective means of safe energy using the renewable means. If you need to stop global warming the Nuclear power has to be there in today’s scenario.

Mar 12, 2011 2:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.