Sponsored Links

Up to 100,000 protest Wisconsin law curbing unions

Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:20pm EST

* Bigger protest than during Vietnam era, police estimate

* Wisconsin battle has ignited national struggle

By James B. Kelleher

MADISON, Wis., March 12 (Reuters) - Up to 100,000 people protested at the Wisconsin state Capitol on Saturday against a new law curbing the union rights of public workers that is seen as one of the biggest challenges in decades facing U.S. organized labor.

Madison police spokesman Joel DeSpain estimated the crowd at 85,000 to 100,000 people, which would top the size of protests in Madison during the Vietnam War.

The demonstration, capping three weeks of public protests, came a day after Republican Governor Scott Walker signed into law a bill to eliminate most bargaining rights for many state government workers.

The state Legislature passed the measure this week after Republicans in the state Senate bypassed a Democratic boycott of the chamber.

The battle in Wisconsin has ignited a national struggle over efforts by several budget-strapped state governments to rein in union power.

Republicans say the measures are needed to gain control of deficit-ridden budgets. Democrats and their union backers say Republicans are ramming through union-busting proposals.

The confrontation with unions could be the biggest showdown with labor since President Ronald Reagan fired striking air traffic controllers nearly 30 years ago.

Protesters on Saturday cheered the Democratic state senators who returned to Wisconsin after fleeing to Illinois for three weeks to try to stall the Legislature's consideration of the measure.

"It's so good to be home in Wisconsin," Democratic Senate Minority Leader Mark Miller told demonstrators, who chanted, "Welcome Home" and "We're With You."

"Our fight to protect union rights has become a fight to protect all our rights -- a fight to protect democracy," said Miller. "You have inspired the nation with your passionate and peaceful protests."

In a statement, Republican Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, instrumental in shepherding the union restrictions through the Legislature, criticized the Democrats.

"It's an absolute insult to the hundreds of thousands of Wisconsinites who are struggling to find a job, much less one they can run away from and go down to Illinois -- with pay," Fitzgerald said.

Restrictions on public sector unions have been introduced in a number of other U.S. states with Republican governors, including Indiana, Ohio, Iowa, Michigan and Florida. Some Democrats see it as the opening salvo of the 2012 presidential election because unions are the biggest single contributors to the Democratic Party. (Reporting by James B. Kelleher; Editing by Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (26)
Nails wrote:
More like 200,000:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXHv7Q5VKGk

Mar 12, 2011 8:37pm EST  --  Report as abuse
jagrio wrote:
look’s like scottie opened pandora’s box, woke a sleeping giant, and was wrong about how the cheeseheads felt about him.

Mar 12, 2011 8:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
NYTony wrote:
“It’s an absolute insult to the hundreds of thousands of Wisconsinites who are struggling to find a job, much less one they can run away from and go down to Illinois — with pay,” Fitzgerald said.

Actually, I believe that they did do their jobs, by slowing it down enough so that everybody both for and against the bill could have some time to discuss it.

I don’t agree with the way that the bill went down, just as I don’t agree with the way the Dems forced the health care bill through at the federal level. BUT at least it was debated for some 14 months.

If Walker had had his way this bill would have been passed with less than a week for people to speak out. A Week, do undo 50 years of tradition. I think letting people on both sides have their say for a few weeks was a good thing, and that the 14 that slowed it down actually were on the side of democracy in this particular instance. Nothing they could do would actually stop it from happening, but they gave people on both sides time to have their say. Democracy is not meant to be streamlined and important bills should not be given short shrift for both supporting and opposing points of view to be heard.

And this viewpoint is coming from a registered republican.

Mar 12, 2011 8:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.