WRAPUP 2-EU mulls nuclear-free future, extra tests on reactors

Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:33pm EDT

Related Topics

* EU energy chief raises prospect of nuclear-free Europe

* General agreement that more "stress tests" needed, he says

* Nuclear safety debate goes beyond earthquake risk

(Adds quotes)

By Pete Harrison and Brian Rohan

BRUSSELS/BERLIN, March 15 (Reuters) - Europe's energy chief on Tuesday raised the prospect of a nuclear-free future and said the 27-nation bloc is considering "stress testing" its nuclear power stations to check they can cope with crises.

The developments mark a dramatic turnaround for a continent that had been considering a nuclear revival until this week, when Japan's nuclear disaster highlighted how quickly events can run out of control, and not only after an earthquake. [ID:nLDE72D2FT]

Ministers, diplomats and nuclear experts at an emergency meeting in Brussels agreed that the continent's 143 nuclear plants should be put through more rigorous stress tests.

"There was general agreement for European stress tests for nuclear power plants in the member states," EU Energy Commissioner Guenther Oettinger told reporters afterwards. "This a reassessement of all potential risks in the wake of what has happened in Japan -- earthquakes, tsunamis, terror attacks ... hazards including power cuts," he said.

The nuclear revival was prompted by Europe's rush to low-carbon energy to guard against climate change, but public mistrust runs high following the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.

Nowhere is the debate more heated than in Germany, where the government went as far as announcing on Tuesday the suspension of operations at all seven of its pre-1980 nuclear plants. [ID:nLDE72E176]

"We must also raise the question -- if we in Europe, in the foreseeable future, can secure our energy needs without nuclear energy," Oettinger told Germany's ARD television.

Nuclear industry body Foratom warned against "knee-jerk" reactions, and other supporters of nuclear power pointed out that Europe is much less geologically active than Japan.

But critics countered that other threats, such as terrorism, could cut a reactor's power supply -- with similar consequences.

Moreover, Bulgaria and Italy are both planning to build reactors in quake-prone areas.


Oettinger's spokeswoman, Marlene Holzner, said Tuesday's meeting focused on safety plans for a number of scenarios.

"What really has made this (Japanese) crisis so heavy and so out of control was the fact that the power supply was completely knocked out," she said.

"What kind of emergency power supply systems are in place? What happens if there were a natural disaster? Do you have in place a second back-up system?"

Though the details of the stress tests are not yet decided, Oettinger said he would take the toughest safety standards in Europe and try to apply them across all 27 member states.

"If we in Germany are examining nuclear plants from the '80s and '90s, we must also raise the question of whether the security check should be done for all atomic plants in Europe."

EU sources said the European Union is tentatively scheduling a second emergency meeting for EU energy ministers next Monday.

Many Europeans are worried about the safety of Soviet-designed reactors in eastern Europe, such as Bulgaria's Kozloduy plant.

Earthquake risk cannot be ruled out in Europe, especially close to the Skopje-Razgrad fault line in Bulgaria, which is considering building a nuclear plant at Belene. [ID:nLDE72D1M5]

And Italy, which is planning to start its own nuclear programme, is also quake prone.

"The European Commission should be more alert on nuclear safety," said Greenpeace nuclear campaigner Jan Haverkamp.

"We still see in the case of Belene that they are relying on bad data and that the Commission accepted a statement saying that there was no seismic risk in northern Bulgaria."

"Fourteen kilometres from the site where Belene is planned, 120 people were killed in 1977 in an earthquake."

The chairman of Bulgaria's nuclear regulator, Sergey Tzotchev, conceded there were issues that needed consideration.

"It's not as seismic as Japan, but there are some problems in this direction," he told reporters in Brussels. (Writing by Pete Harrison; Additional reporting by Eva Dou and Marine Hass; Editing by Louise Ireland)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

California state worker Albert Jagow (L) goes over his retirement options with Calpers Retirement Program Specialist JeanAnn Kirkpatrick at the Calpers regional office in Sacramento, California October 21, 2009. Calpers, the largest U.S. public pension fund, manages retirement benefits for more than 1.6 million people, with assets comparable in value to the entire GDP of Israel. The Calpers investment portfolio had a historic drop in value, going from a peak of $250 billion in the fall of 2007 to $167 billion in March 2009, a loss of about a third during that period. It is now around $200 billion. REUTERS/Max Whittaker   (UNITED STATES) - RTXPWOZ

How to get out of debt

Financial adviser Eric Brotman offers strategies for cutting debt from student loans and elder care -- and how to avoid money woes in the first place.  Video