Russia says Japan may face meltdown at six reactors

Related Topics

NOVO-OGARYOVO, Russia, March 15 | Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:19am EDT

NOVO-OGARYOVO, Russia, March 15 (Reuters) - Russia's nuclear chief warned on Tuesday that all six reactors at a stricken Japanese nuclear plant could melt down unless the authorities scrambled to cool down the nuclear fuel rods. [ID:LDE72E0A0]

Japan is grappling with a nuclear disaster after the quake-crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant exploded in the worst nuclear accident since the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in Soviet Ukraine.

Sergei Kiriyenko, who holds sway over most of the former Soviet Union's nuclear facilities, told Russia's paramount leader, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, that under the worst case scenario all six reactors could melt down.

"All six can pose a threat unfortunately," Rosatom chief Kiriyenko told Putin at a hastily convened meeting at Putin's Novo-Ogaryovo residence outside Moscow.

"But even if there is a meltdown at all six then this will still not lead to a nuclear explosion," he said.

Kiriyenko added that gas escaping from the damaged reactors was spewing out radiation and that another risk is that the water being used for cooling the reactors could contaminate the water table.

Kiriyenko said the information Russia was receiving from Tokyo was often patchy and out of date but that a group of Russian nuclear experts had been working on models trying to predict the worst case scenario in the disaster.

Kiriyenko said a failure by the Japanese authorities to pour water into the fuel pool of reactor No. 4 had allowed it to overheat sparking a fire.

"Nearby are reactors No. 5 and No. 6 where... the temperature is rising... so most likely in the fuel pool," he said.

Kiriyenko said there was very little chance of an explosion with the force that could propel radioactive dust up high enough into the atmosphere to pose a significant risk to Russia, even if there were strong winds towards Russian territory. (Reporting by Darya Korsunskaya, writing by Alexei Anishchuk)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
aliester314 wrote:
“Kiriyenko said a failure by the Japanese authorities to pour water into the fuel pool of reactor No. 4 had allowed it to overheat sparking a fire.” While factually correct I find the authors’ choice of words to be asinine. That crew is 60 persons against a worst case scenario following a disaster of astonishing proportions, I would never call inability in such a situation a ‘failure’ regardless of the outcome.

Mar 15, 2011 9:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Pancho3 wrote:
Why doesn’t Japan flood the reactors with a slurry containing a neutron absorber or damper such as beryllium. boron, or lithium?

Mar 16, 2011 12:56pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
damage set in motion will be beyond comprehension
“Now I am become death….The destroyer of worlds”

Mar 17, 2011 5:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.