Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Flooding in India

Heavy monsoon rains have swollen several rivers.  Slideshow 

Photo

Celebrity portraits

Up close and personal with famous faces.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Chernobyl clean-up expert slams Japan, IAEA

VIENNA | Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:42pm EDT

VIENNA (Reuters) - Greed in the nuclear industry and corporate influence over the U.N. watchdog for atomic energy may doom Japan to a spreading nuclear disaster, one of the men brought in to clean up Chernobyl said on Tuesday.

Slamming the Japanese response at Fukushima, Russian nuclear accident specialist Iouli Andreev accused corporations and the United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) of wilfully ignoring lessons from the world's worst nuclear accident 25 years ago to protect the industry's expansion.

"After Chernobyl all the force of the nuclear industry was directed to hide this event, for not creating damage to their reputation. The Chernobyl experience was not studied properly because who has money for studying? Only industry.

"But industry doesn't like it," he said in an interview in Vienna where the former director of the Soviet Spetsatom clean-up agency now teaches and advises on nuclear safety. Austria's environment ministry has used him as an adviser.

Andreev said a fire which released radiation on Tuesday involving spent fuel rods stored close to reactors at Fukushima looked like an example of putting profit before safety:

"The Japanese were very greedy and they used every square inch of the space. But when you have a dense placing of spent fuel in the basin you have a high possibility of fire if the water is removed from the basin," Andreev said.

The IAEA should share blame for standards, he said, arguing it was too close to corporations building and running plants. And he dismissed an emergency incident team set up by the Vienna-based agency as "only a think-tank not a working force":

"This is only a fake organization because every organization which depends on the nuclear industry - and the IAEA depends on the nuclear industry - cannot perform properly.

"It always will try to hide the reality.

"The IAEA ... is not interested in the concentration of attention on a possible accident in the nuclear industry. They are totally not interested in all the emergency organizations."

The IAEA had no immediate comment on Andreev's criticism.

Andreev said he understood all too well what the Japanese authorities in Fukushima were going through, and that creative solutions would be needed to contain the leaks.

"It is a situation of quiet panic. I know this situation," he said. "Discipline is the main thing in the industry but the emergency service requires creativity, requires some kind of even fantasy and improvisation."

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (22)
inverse137 wrote:
OK, here’s my armchair quarter-back solution. Militarize the entire nuclear industry. Yes, SOCIALIZE. But the idiot conservatives would rather PAY MORE and have less safe facilities than if the military did it. How many nuclear vessel accidents do you see?

The regimented nature of the military goes hand in hand with the regimented requirements of a nuclear facility.

It’s a win/win. Military gets expanded, nuclear industry gets safer, our dependence on foreign oil is reduced and the populace gets cheaper, cleaner, safer electricity

Mar 15, 2011 3:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
GalacticCat wrote:
The containment vessels damaged at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant and other vessels there under severe strain, are a design, developed in the 1960s by General Electric USA.. GE engineers used a smaller containment design which was more susceptible to explosion and rupture from a buildup in hydrogen . And in true American Corporate style, cheapness , cost and profit , trumped safety, and human health concerns. Way not to go GE and America.

Mar 15, 2011 3:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
verakot wrote:
@ unverse137

The government is not a solution. The government is a problem.
- Roland Reagan

Mar 15, 2011 3:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.