Tight budgets may spell death of death penalty in some states

NEW YORK Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:33am EDT

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A perfect storm of cash-strapped budgets, newly elected governors and an increased use of DNA evidence threatens to smite the death penalty in an increasing number of states.

The death penalty got the ax in Illinois last week and stands a good chance of being eliminated this year in Connecticut, Maryland and Montana, where bills are wending their way through statehouses, said Richard Dieter, executive director for the Death Penalty Information Center.

Repeal efforts also are underway in Florida and Kansas, with another expected this week in Ohio, although their success is less likely, Dieter said.

"Innocence is the biggest issue, but what's getting these bills heard is the cost of the death penalty," Dieter said.

Studies show the basic cost of carrying out the death sentence is more than double that of a life sentence.

Lawmakers promoting the death-penalty repeal measure in Ohio say they hope to sell it as a way to help close the state's $8 billion budget deficit.

"We're proposing this as a way that the state can substantially save some money," said Democratic state Rep. Ted Celeste.

However, the measure is unlikely to go far in the Republican-controlled House and Senate, where many members were elected with support of death penalty advocates.

If the legislation did pass, Republican Governor John Kasich, who has allowed two executions to proceed during his first three months in office, is unlikely to sign it into law.

Helping fuel repeal measures is the prevalence of DNA evidence in overturning wrongful convictions, not just in the courtroom but in Hollywood dramas that sway popular opinion.

In Illinois, which last week became the fourth state in the past two years to ban the death penalty, Democratic Governor Pat Quinn said it was impossible to fix a system that wrongly condemned 20 men later found to be innocent and freed from death row in his state.

Next could be Connecticut, where newly elected Democratic Governor Dan Malloy has said he favors a death penalty ban now being considered in the statehouse.

The last legislature in Connecticut passed a similar bill but it was vetoed by then-governor Jodi Rell.

The cost of the death penalty is tempting to axe-wielding legislatures desperate to cut costs, Dieter said.

"Death row is expensive compared to regular prison," he said. "Your meals are delivered. You don't work in the prison. If you have a visitor, you're shackled. You're watched 24 hours. You have a single cell."

Typically in capital cases, taxpayers pay for at least two defense attorneys as well as DNA experts, he said.

In Maryland, the average total cost of a life sentence is $1 million, compared with $3 million to carry out the death penalty, he said.

In California, the annual cost of imprisoning an inmate is $25,000 compared to $90,000 for a year on death row, Dieter said.

Dudley Sharp, a death penalty advocate, said both the wrongful conviction and budget arguments are overblown.

He said nationwide, only 15 people -- nine on death row and six whose death sentences had been commuted to life -- have been freed due to DNA evidence of their wrongful conviction.

He said the death penalty could be more economical if states imposed tighter time frames for appeals, citing the example of Virginia where he said a case typically lasts five to seven years from conviction to execution.

"Nationwide the average time from conviction to execution is 10 to 11 years," he said. "You have to be responsible and manage your budgets properly."

(Additional reporting by Jo Ingles in Columbus; Editing by Ellen Wulfhorst and Jerry Norton)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
DrJJJJ wrote:
Just one of the many moral consequences of too much debt/government!

Mar 15, 2011 11:19am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ralphooo wrote:
“A perfect storm of cash-strapped budgets, newly elected governors and an increased use of DNA evidence threatens to smite the death penalty in an increasing number of states.”

Death, be not proud, though some have called thee
Mighty and dreadful, for thou art not so;
For those whom thou thinkst thou dost overthrow
Die not, poor Death, nor yet canst thou kill me.
From rest and sleep, which but thy pictures be
Much pleasure; then from thee much more must flow
And soonest our best men with thee do go
Rest of their bones and soul’s delivery.
Thou art slave to Fate, Chance, kings, and desperate men,
And dost with poison, war, and sickness dwell,
And poppies or charms can make us sleep as well
And better than thy stroke. Why swellst thou then?
One short sleep past, we wake eternally,
And death shall be no more; Death, thou shalt die!
– John Donne

Mar 15, 2011 12:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
B_Dub wrote:
There are ways to save money besides abolishing the death penalty. Instead of having a “death row”, let the condemned spend their time before their execution with the rest of the inmates. Let them wait in line for their food and be subjected to the same dangers that the rest of the prison population is. Or, once they’re sentenced, make the execution window much shorter. With today’s technology, there’s ample opportunity for the prosecution’s cases to be disproved. If they’re placed at the scene, with irrefutable witness and DNA evidence, then the judgment should be guilty with prejudice (no appeals allowed). That’s what the requirement should be to receive a death penalty anyway.

It’s amazing how our government will look for ways to save money but those ways end up costing more money than before.

Mar 16, 2011 7:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.