An aerial view shows the pack of riders as they cycle along the coast during the 145,5 km third stage of the centenary Tour de France from Ajaccio to Calvi, on the French Mediterranean island of Corsica July 1, 2013. REUTERS/Pascal Pochard-Casabianca/Pool

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Egypt's Mursi protests

Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi clings to office as protesters demand that he resign.  Slideshow 

Photo

Obama in Africa

President Obama is seeking to build a new economic partnership with Africa at the end of a tour of the fast-growing continent.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Factbox: How much radiation is dangerous?

A Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (DEZA) worker packs instruments for the measurement of nuclear radiation to send to Swiss Rescue workers in Japan, at the DEZA logistic - center in Wabern March 14, 2011. REUTERS/Pascal Lauener

A Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (DEZA) worker packs instruments for the measurement of nuclear radiation to send to Swiss Rescue workers in Japan, at the DEZA logistic - center in Wabern March 14, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Pascal Lauener

Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:41am EDT

(Reuters) - Health experts urged governments in the Asia Pacific to monitor radioactivity levels after Japan's quake-damaged nuclear power plant exploded and sent radiation into the air.

Radiation is measured using the unit sievert, which quantifies the amount of radiation absorbed by human tissues.

One sievert is 1,000 millisieverts (mSv). One millisievert is 1,000 microsieverts.

Below are some facts about the health dangers posed by higher radiation levels:

* Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano had, at one point, said radiation levels near the stricken plant on the northeast coast reached as high as 400 millisieverts (mSv) an hour. That figure would be would be 20 times the annual exposure for some nuclear-industry employees and uranium miners.

* People are exposed to natural radiation of 2-3 mSv a year.

* In a CT scan, the organ being studied typically receives a radiation dose of 15 mSv in an adult to 30 mSv in a newborn infant.

A typical chest X-ray involves exposure of about 0.02 mSv, while a dental one can be 0.01 mSv.

* Exposure to 100 mSv a year is the lowest level at which any increase in cancer risk is clearly evident. A cumulative 1,000 mSv (1 sievert) would probably cause a fatal cancer many years later in five out of every 100 persons exposed to it.

* There is documented evidence associating an accumulated dose of 90 mSv from two or three CT scans with an increased risk of cancer. The evidence is reasonably convincing for adults and very convincing for children.

* Large doses of radiation or acute radiation exposure destroys the central nervous system, red and white blood cells, which compromises the immune system, leaving the victim unable to fight off infections.

For example, a single one sievert (1,000 mSv) dose causes radiation sickness such as nausea, vomiting, hemorrhaging, but not death. A single dose of 5 sieverts would kill about half of those exposed to it within a month.

* Exposure to 350 mSv was the criterion for relocating people after the Chernobyl accident, according to the World Nuclear Association.

*"Very acute radiation, like that which happened in Chernobyl and to the Japanese workers at the nuclear power station, is unlikely for the population," said Lam Ching-wan, a chemical pathologist at the university of Hong Kong.

For the latest news on Japan's nuclear crisis, click

Sources: the New England Journal of Medicine, World Nuclear Association and Taiwan's Atomic Energy Council

(Compiled by Richard Borsuk, Kim Coghill, Tan Ee Lyn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
ben1990 wrote:
WRONG WRONG WRONG!

* People are exposed to natural radiation of 2-3 mSv a year.

The units are wrong. People are exposed from 2 to 3 rem per year. This is the equivalent of 20,000-30,000 mSv. 1 mSv = .01 mrem. Your numbers are so grossly exaggerated!

Mar 15, 2011 7:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
oldtimer78 wrote:
I must correct Ben1990. He says 1 mSv = .01 mrem, that is 1 Sv = .01 rem,that is 1 rem = 100 Sv. If people are exposed to 2 – 3 rem per year this is 200 – 300 Sv. Since 1 Sv is 1000 mSv, the natural dose per year is 200,000 – 300,000 mSv. Ben’s arithmetic puts it at 20,000 – 30,000 mSv.
There’s something odd here: the article above says a dose of 5 sieverts (5000 mSv) would kill half the population exposed to it in one month.
Since we’re all exposed to 40 – 60 times as much in one year, the death rate from radiation should be much higher than it is.

Mar 16, 2011 2:12pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Dose units are among the most confusing concepts in radiation health physics…

First of all: 1 Sv = 100 rem.

In the US, yearly natural background exposure is approximately 300 mrem, or 0.3 rem. If the average dose from medical procedures is added, that doubles to approximately 0.6 rem. Occupational exposure limits are set at 5 rem per year for radiation workers.

[0.3 to 0.6 rem] = [0.003 to 0.006 Sv] = [3 - 6 mSv]

Mar 16, 2011 9:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.