German green industries say can fill nuclear gaps

FRANKFURT Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:59am EDT

A power generating wind turbine is reflected in solar panels near Mainz, March 10, 2010. REUTERS/Thomas Bohlen

A power generating wind turbine is reflected in solar panels near Mainz, March 10, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Thomas Bohlen

FRANKFURT (Reuters) - German renewable industry lobby BEE said on Wednesday it would be able to supply 47 percent of German power requirements by 2020, joining a debate on how to replace nuclear generation capacity.

The lobby, which groups 22 individual units representing wind, hydro, solar and biomass-to-power producer interests, said it could offer a high share of reliable renewable supply.

"Renewables could be ready to provide 47 percent of German power supply up to 2020. This way they would not just compensate for the nuclear withdrawal (meant to happen by 2021 at the latest) but in addition offer affordable and sustainable power," the group said.

Last year, renewable power supplied 17 percent of German electricity output of 585 billion kilowatt hours, while nuclear generation accounted for 23 percent, industry data shows.

Germany's government said on Tuesday it would shut down seven nuclear power plants that had begun operating before 1980 at least until June, leaving open whether they will ever start up again after Japan's crisis.

It also has to decide whether to go back to an 11-year old program to close down all 17 of its reactors or to extend the operating life of some of the younger plants beyond what was laid down in the original agreement. It had ruled to extend nuclear lifespans last autumn.

While the situation is in flux, Germany must draw up new plans on how to secure its future electricity supplies.

Power sectors based on coal, gas and renewables have so far been shy to present their merits, because they do not want to appear as winners of the negative publicity for nuclear that has been caused by the Japanese disaster, observers say.

The standard argument against renewables is their volatile production levels. BEE said an expansion could cure that problem, but could not happen as long as Germany is oversupplied with thermal capacity.

"In 2007, up to six nuclear reactors were out of action at one stage (due to summer heat), but Germany still had one of its biggest power export surpluses that year," it said.

Continuing nuclear operations will hold back renewables from coming to full play by 16 years, BEE said.

It also said it could offer combination plants that would balance out the volatility between various renewables but that the scheme had so far been ignored.

(Reporting by Vera Eckert, editing by Jane Baird)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Jos_desouza wrote:
The sooner nuclear reactors are phased-out the better because they’re a barrier to faster and more widespread adoption of variable but very promising renewables such as solar and wind power. If Germany really wants to reach a level higher than 45% renewable electricity by 2020, then it should get rid of more nuclear as well as coal-fired power plants in the meantime. And also invest in new transmission lines as well as some storage and perhaps a modicum of DSM. On a more advanced stage, whole national grids all over Europe and North Africa and, who knows, the Middle East should be integrated according to this proposal. Technically speaking, it’s all feasible and has already been demonstrated, but politically…Ah, well, it’s another issue…

Mar 18, 2011 9:45am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.