Congress buys more time for budget dispute

WASHINGTON Thu Mar 17, 2011 4:37pm EDT

Speaker of the House John Boehner speaks to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington February 10, 2011. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

Speaker of the House John Boehner speaks to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington February 10, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Joshua Roberts

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Congress on Thursday bought itself more time to work out a much-delayed budget deal as the costs of the stalemate were increasingly felt across the globe.

By a vote of 87 to 13, the Democratic-controlled Senate passed a sixth stopgap bill to keep the government running through April 8, more than six months after the fiscal year began.

The House of Representatives, controlled by Republicans, passed the measure on Tuesday.

The two parties now have three weeks to resolve a $50 billion gap between their rival spending plans. While Republicans are eager to keep a campaign promise to scale back the size of government, Democrats worry that sharp cuts would imperil a shaky U.S. economic recovery.

Lawmakers have extended last year's budget to ensure that government agencies continued to function during the standoff. That approach has made it difficult for government agencies to shift money where it is most needed, leading to layoffs, delayed construction projects and reduced scientific research.

"Continuing to fund our government in two or three week increments adds uncertainty to our economy and distracts us from other urgent priorities facing our nation," White House spokesman Jay Carney said in a prepared statement.

With passage of the latest stopgap measure, Republicans have managed to trim $10 billion from the budget, mostly in noncontroversial areas backed by President Barack Obama.

Senator Jeff Sessions, the top Republican on the Budget Committee, said that the cuts achieved during the stopgaps put Congress on pace to achieve the $61 billion in immediate cuts outlined by a Republican plan that has passed the House.

With budget deficits hovering around 10 percent of GDP in recent years, Sessions said Congress needed to show bond markets that the United States could get its rapidly growing debt under control.

"If we fail to do something significant I think it would send the wrong message around the world," Sessions said.

TEA PARTY OPPOSITION

But further cuts will encounter greater resistance from Democrats.

Democratic Senator Daniel Inouye, who oversees spending as chairman of the Appropriations Committee, said domestic agencies would effectively be operating at a level 10 percent below last year when inflation and other rising costs, such as employee benefits, were taken into account.

"How much more of this spending can we really afford to cut before we are required to lay off food inspectors and shut down meat plants? How much more can we cut before we have no funds to pay employees to monitor our borders and ports?" Inouye said on the Senate floor.

After months of fiery rhetoric, congressional leaders and the White House suggest they are making progress toward a bipartisan funding plan. Many lawmakers are growing increasingly impatient with the standoff and have said they will not support another temporary extension.

House Speaker John Boehner needed Democratic support to pass the stopgap bill on Tuesday after 54 conservative Republicans refused to support it because it did not go far enough. He may need to bring Democrats to the table to pass a final bill also.

Conservatives aligned to the populist Tea Party movement have said they will oppose a final plan if it did not include provisions to block funds for the administration's healthcare overhaul, a measure Obama would be sure to veto.

"We will have a hard time coming to an agreement if those on the hard right treat the budget as an opportunity to enact a far-ranging agenda," said Senator Charles Schumer, a top Democrat.

The House later voted 228 to 192 to deny government funding to National Public Radio, which drew further conservative ire in the wake of an Internet video that showed a top NPR official disparaging Tea Party activists and questioning whether the broadcaster needed its government funding.

Republicans often accuse NPR of having a liberal bias.

(Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Paul Simao)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
The Rebumblingcans are costing taxpayers huge sums of money with their tactics. This is an extreme example of government run amok. Congress, now under the stewardship of the Rebumlingcans have destroyed government agencies’ ability to function on a productive orginized manner. In their myopic quest to show their fiscal prowess they are causing huge losses in productivity of departments and their human resourses. These are losses that offset any savings taxpayer will ever see from their showboating and their my way or else attitude. Congress and the Tea Party Rebumblingcans are an absolute joke and an embarassment to themselves and a failure at representing the best interests of American Taxpayers. There is NO EXCUSE for being this far into the fiscal year without a budget being passed. Time for the new Tea Party members of Congress to get over the shock that keeping campaign promises is not always possible in dealing with the reality of the moment and may be overly simplistic.

Mar 17, 2011 3:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
varela wrote:
I agree with nativearizonan the repubs/teabaggers a.k.a the party of “NO” are the ones who shut the government down in the 90’s and now they want to do it again for a difference of 50million. 50million is pocket change when compared to the trillions that are spent on defense and entitlements. To me it just seems like the party of “NO” is grandstanding for it’s base.

Mar 17, 2011 11:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
DrJJJJ wrote:
I agree, it’s a national disgrace for leaders to insist we cut spending and to set a goal of balancing a budget or two somewhere in the US! Charge it, spend our way out and ask what your country can do for you-the progressive world view! We’ll change when we run out of money and there’s civil unrest on every street corner-in the interest of fariness and equality! The dumming down of America is complete-we’ve arrived!

Mar 17, 2011 2:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.