An aerial view shows the pack of riders as they cycle along the coast during the 145,5 km third stage of the centenary Tour de France from Ajaccio to Calvi, on the French Mediterranean island of Corsica July 1, 2013. REUTERS/Pascal Pochard-Casabianca/Pool

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Egypt's Mursi protests

Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi clings to office as protesters demand that he resign.  Slideshow 

Photo

Obama in Africa

President Obama is seeking to build a new economic partnership with Africa at the end of a tour of the fast-growing continent.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

IAEA tracks radiation leaks at Japan's crippled plant

1 of 31. Owada Yuna carries her three-year-old sister Yumeka as she searches for names of her 20 missing high school friends at a shelter for those evacuated from the disaster zone in Rikuzentakai, March 21, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Damir Sagolj

TOKYO | Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:55pm EDT

TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan's earthquake-hit nuclear complex is still emitting radiation but the source is unclear, a senior U.N. atomic agency official said, as workers faced another day of struggle on Wednesday to cool damaged reactor cores.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) also raised concerns about a lack of information from Japanese authorities, as rising temperatures around the core of one reactor threatened to delay work.

"We continue to see radiation coming from the site ... and the question is where exactly is that coming from?" James Lyons, a senior official of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told a news conference in Vienna on Tuesday.

Despite hopes of progress in the world's worst nuclear crisis in a quarter of a century, triggered by an earthquake and tsunami that left at least 21,000 people dead or missing, plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) said it needed more time before it could say the reactors were stabilized.

Senior IAEA official Graham Andrew said that the overall situation remained "very serious" and that the U.N. atomic watchdog was concerned it had not received some information from Japan about the Fukushima nuclear plant.

"We have not received validated information for some time related to the containment integrity of unit 1. So we are concerned that we do not know its exact status," he said.

The IAEA also lacks data on the temperatures of the spent fuel pools of reactors 1, 3 and 4, he said, though Japan was supplying other updates.

Technicians working inside an evacuation zone around the plant on Japan's northeast Pacific coast, 250 km (150 miles) north of Tokyo, have attached power cables to all six reactors and started a pump at one to cool overheating nuclear fuel rods.

Local media reported late on Tuesday that lighting had been restored at one of the control rooms, bringing the operators a step closer to reviving the plant's cooling systems.

Earlier smoke and steam were seen rising from two of the most threatening reactors, No.2 and No.3, stoking new fears of radiation. Officials later said smoke at reactor No.3 had stopped and there was only a small amount at No.2.

There have been several blasts of steam from the reactors during the crisis, which experts say probably released a small amount of radioactive particles.

Concern has also grown over the core of reactor No. 1 after its temperature rose to 380-390 Celsius (715-735 Fahrenheit), TEPCO executive vice president Sakae Muto said. The reactor was built to run at a temperature of 302 C (575 F).

Reuters earlier reported that the Fukushima plant was storing more uranium than it was originally designed to hold, and that it had repeatedly missed mandatory safety checks over the past decade, according to company documents and outside experts.

Questions have also been raised about whether TEPCO officials waited too long to pump sea water into the reactors and abandon hope of saving the equipment in the aftermath of the earthquake and tsunami.

RADIATION FEARS

Away from the plant, mounting evidence of radiation in vegetables, water and milk stirred concerns in Japan and abroad despite officials' assurances that the levels were not dangerous.

Kyodo news agency said on Wednesday broccoli and a leafy vegetable called Japanese mustard spinach from Fukushima were detected with radioactive contamination above safety limits.

TEPCO said radiation was found in the Pacific Ocean nearby, not surprising given rain and the hosing of reactors with sea-water. TEPCO officials have said some of the water from the hosing was spilling into the sea.

Radioactive iodine in the sea samples was 126.7 times the allowed limit, while cesium was 24.8 times over, the Kyodo news agency said. That still posed no immediate danger, TEPCO said.

"It would have to be drunk for a whole year in order to accumulate to 1 millisievert," a TEPCO official said, referring to the standard radiation measurement unit.

People are generally exposed to 1-10 millisieverts a year from background radiation caused by substances in the air and soil.

The Health Ministrysaid residents of five municipalities in Fukushima should not use tap water for baby powder milk after the water was found to have more than the standard level of radioactive iodine allowed for babies. Authorities have also stopped shipments of milk and some vegetables from the area.

Despite the warnings, experts say readings are much lower than around Chernobyl after the 1986 accident in Ukraine.

Japan's neighbors including China, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand, are monitoring Japanese food imports. Australia's food regulator said the risk was negligible and no extra restrictions on Japanese food were in place.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Tuesday he was concerned about radioactive fallout affecting the 55,000 troops in and around Japan, many involved in a massive relief operation for Washington's close ally.

"We're watching it very carefully. We're very concerned about the health of our men and women in uniform," he said.

"But we're also deeply concerned about the well being of our Japanese allies," Gates told reporters in Moscow. He gave no indication the Pentagon was rethinking its massive aid effort.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visited the Japanese embassy in Washington on Tuesday and vowed "We will be with Japan and the people of Japan as you recover and rebuild, and we will stand with you in the months and years ahead."

Miniscule numbers of radioactive particles believed to have come from the crippled nuclear power plant have been detected as far away as Iceland, diplomatic sources said.

They stressed the tiny traces, measured by a network of international monitoring stations as they spread eastwards from Japan across the Pacific, North America, the Atlantic and to Europe, were far too low to cause any harm to humans.

"It's only a matter of days before it disperses in the entire northern hemisphere," Andreas Stohl, a senior scientist at the Norwegian Institute for Air Research, said. "Over Europe there would be no concern about human health."

Nevertheless, Italy's Industry Minister Paolo Romani said on Tuesday the government will announce a one-year moratorium on site selection and building of nuclear power plants.

MORATORIUM

A poll of 814 Americans conducted last week by ORC International for the Civil Society Institute think tank and released on Tuesday found 53 percent would support a moratorium on new nuclear reactor construction if the country was able to meet its energy demand through increased efficiency and renewable sources such as wind and solar.

The prospects of a nuclear meltdown in the world's third-biggest economy -- and its key position in global supply chains, especially for the automobile and technology sectors -- rattled investors worldwide last week and prompted rare joint currency intervention by the G7 group of rich nations.

Damage from the earthquake and tsunami is estimated at $250 billion, making it the world's costliest natural disaster.

The official death toll exceeded 9,000, but with 12,654 people reported missing, it is certain to rise. Police say more than 15,000 people probably died in Miyagi prefecture, one of four that took the brunt of the tsunami.

The quake and tsunami obliterated towns and left more than 350,000 people homeless.

(Additional reporting by Mayumi Negishi, Paul Eckert and Raju Gopalakrishnan in Tokyo, Jon Herskovitz and Chisa Fujioka in Kamaishi, Frederik Dahl and Sylvia Westall in Vienna,; Alister Doyle in Oslo, Phil Stewart in Moscow and Christopher Doering in Washington; Writing by Paul Eckert; Editing by Sanjeev Miglani)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (23)
10hawks wrote:
How ignorant is Reuters of the actual situation at the Fukushima Daiichi plant? International nuclear energy top experts are comparing the present
situation to the Chernobyl disaster, with radiation releases at significantly higher levels than seen at Chernobyl, while the mainstream
media is obfuscating and outright lying about the severe risk
to not only the local area, but to prefectures surrounding Fukushima
and to Tokyo, where radioactive iodine has been detected in tap water.
Radioactive iodine, strontium and cesium are being released into the
atmosphere and will be carried around the world by prevailing winds. Many deaths are already being reported in Japan downwind of the destroyed reactors, three of which are currently in meltdown mode.
Where is the reporting, Reuters?

Mar 22, 2011 2:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
10hawks wrote:
How ignorant is Reuters of the actual situation at the Fukushima Daiichi plant? International nuclear energy top experts are comparing the present
situation to the Chernobyl disaster, with radiation releases at significantly higher levels than seen at Chernobyl, while the mainstream
media is obfuscating and outright lying about the severe risk
to not only the local area, but to prefectures surrounding Fukushima
and to Tokyo, where radioactive iodine has been detected in tap water.
Radioactive iodine, strontium and cesium are being released into the
atmosphere and will be carried around the world by prevailing winds. Many deaths are already being reported in Japan downwind of the destroyed reactors, three of which are currently in meltdown mode.
Where is the reporting, Reuters?

Mar 22, 2011 2:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
paintcan wrote:
What is the point of having environmental regs that can be so far exceeded and still hear claims that there is no risk?

It’s almost laughable. I live in a small community that a few years ago had a new well dug for its municipal water system. The water it produced exceeded only slightly the new acceptable levels for arsenic put in place during the Clinton years. The community had to build a water purification plant to remove the few parts per million excess at a cost of a 1/4 million dollars for the filtration plant. It took several years before it went on line and we were not supposed to drink or cook with it. I ignored it because I am old and don’t care. I smoke – what’s another toxin to me?

If the Japanese can claim that radiation readings that so far exceed their own environmental regs are actually harmless than perhaps all their environmental regs are wrong? Or perhaps they are trying to destroy the credibility of those regs themselves? Tell enough conflicting “truths” and who needs lies? Or tell enough conflicting lies and try to find a truth?

Arsenic is something that in very small doses can produce immunity. There is even a term for it: “Mithridatism”. There is no such immunity acquired from radiation exposure. There is an enormous liability issue at stake here and the Japanese may be lying through their teeth just to prevent the owners of the plant from being sued. But the Japanese have their charming group think ways.

Mar 22, 2011 2:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.