Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Obama pledges $200 million to Central America drug fight

Related Topics

1 of 20. President Obama kicks a soccer ball with children during his visit to the Ciudad de Deus Favela neighbourhood in Rio de Janeiro, March 20, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

SAN SALVADOR | Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:11pm EDT

SAN SALVADOR (Reuters) - President Barack Obama pledged $200 million on Tuesday to combat drug trafficking and street gangs in Central America on the final leg of a regional tour to bolster U.S. ties with southern neighbors who have often felt neglected by Washington.

Obama unveiled the new aid program as aides announced he would cut short his El Salvador visit slightly on Wednesday and head back to Washington, where the political debate over the U.S. military role in air assaults against Libya's Muammar Gaddafi was gathering momentum.

Shifting to tiny, impoverished El Salvador after visiting economically thriving Brazil and Chile, Obama arrived with his attention split as he faced questions and criticism at home and abroad over U.S. goals in the U.N.-approved attacks in Libya.

The final leg of Obama's Latin American tour marked a change in focus from issues of trade and investment that dominated his first stops aimed largely at reasserting U.S. interests in a region where China is posing growing competition.

Talks with President Mauricio Funes, a moderate leftist the White House sees as an emerging partner, dealt with boosting cooperation on drug enforcement and searching for common ground on volatile immigration matters. Both issues resonate loudly with Washington's neighbors and among U.S. voters.

At a joint news conference, Obama offered fresh assistance for the anti-drug fight by governments in Central America, which has suffered a spillover of drug violence from Mexico, home to powerful narcotics cartels.

"We are launching a new effort against gangs in Central America to support efforts here in the region ... including the social and economic forces that drive young people toward criminality," Obama said. He said it would help train security forces, strengthen courts and tackle underlying poverty.

Funes welcomed the new U.S. initiative and also made a point of praising Obama for acknowledging the need for greater U.S. efforts to curb U.S. demand for illegal drugs, which countries in the region see as the root of the problem.

U.S. drug consumption and gun-running are issues that have been a particular source of tension with Mexico.

The El Salvador visit will wrap up a five-day mission to reengage with Latin America and forge what Obama has called a "new era of partnership" with a region where many sensed that they had slipped down the U.S. list of priorities.

Obama's trip is seen to have helped reinforce hemispheric ties, but the Libya attacks do not go down well with most of Latin America and he has delivered no major breakthroughs on long-promised trade pacts or key trade disputes.

Obama's travels were dogged by concern over the Western military campaign over Libya. He is struggling to balance his handling of world crises with his domestic priorities of job creation and economic recovery, considered crucial to his 2012 re-election chances.

The White House said a visit planned for Wednesday to San Salvador's cathedral to pay homage at the tomb of slain Archbishop Oscar Romero was shifted to Tuesday, and a tour of Mayan ruins set for outside the city on Wednesday was scrapped to allow Obama to hold a teleconference with Libya advisers in the morning and then fly out about two hours early.

(Editing by John Whitesides, Philip Barbara and Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
jhardaway wrote:
Right idea, wrong execution. Brazil is the only economy in the western hemisphere that is part of the BRIC. NAFTA should become WHFTA. If you can’t keep it in the family, you might as well keep it in the hemisphere.

Mar 21, 2011 9:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
mikemm wrote:
my ife and I have been to South America many times and know people from several countries. It never ceases to amaze me how we almost act like South America doesn’t even exist. The American view of the world is almost totally based on North America, Europe, and Asia, and sometimes Africa, Australia, and New Zealand (if major news stories break). It’s almost as if we only look at the northern hemisphere as the world we live in and everthing below the equator is only an afterthought.

South America is a thriving mix of democracies and expanding markets. It’s not the stereotypical third word countries where rebels are always overthrowing the government that most people assume. The culture is wonderful. The cities are very European in layout and feel. The potenial markets and business connections are enormous. We need to start forging more of these alliances with them before they lock all of their business deals into Europe and Asia. There’s real potential there and the USA needs to be proactive in going after it.

Mar 22, 2011 10:07am EDT  --  Report as abuse
iowafarm wrote:
Brazil is our largest soybean competitor in international markets. They are also an ethanol competitor. Their cost of production is much smaller than ours because they do not have an out-of-control EPA mandating “dust” rules and “cow tax” rules. There is absolutely NO REASON to subsidize their oil drilling at taxpayer expense. Instead, we should be building infrastructure for ethanol that we have to export because we can’t use enough of it in this country – An Iowa Farmer

Mar 22, 2011 11:18am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.