Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rebel fighter training

Training new recruits to Congo's M23 insurgent group.  Slideshow 

Photo

Running while blind

Blind or visually impaired students compete in blind track and field tournament.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Lawmakers turn to public on Obama clean energy plan

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:25am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The leadership of the Senate Energy Committee is seeking public input on how to fashion a bill creating the White House's national standard for generating more U.S. electricity from clean energy sources, delaying the bill's arrival in Congress.

Back in January, President Barack Obama told Congress in his State of the Union address that by 2035 he wanted 80 percent of U.S. electricity to be generated by clean energy sources, including nuclear power.

The chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Senator Jeff Bingaman, and his staff have been in discussions with the White House for almost two months on the clean energy standard legislation.

Bingaman and the top Republican on the energy panel, Senator Lisa Murkowski, issued a "white paper" on Monday seeking comment from the public on what the clean energy standard should look like.

While the president said he wanted to include nuclear power in the standard, Bingaman and Murkowski asked in their white paper what energy sources should qualify as clean energy, and if Japan's nuclear crisis "may affect the potential growth" in the U.S. nuclear generating capacity.

It's fairly unusual for legislation to be written this way, especially for something that is a top priority of the White House.

A Bingaman aide stressed the white paper did not mean the bill was in trouble. "We're just trying to make sure that enough members of the committee to pass the bill out are on board and agree that we have it structured properly," the aide said.

The lawmakers also asked if all electric utilities should be subject to a clean energy standard.

They noted that in similar legislation passed by the Senate energy committee in the last Congress, only utilities selling more than four million megawatt hours of power in a calendar year would be subject to a clean energy mandate. Obama's plan doesn't have such a threshold.

In addition, Hawaii was exempted from the Senate bill that required utilities to generate 15 percent of their power from renewable energy sources, like solar and wind, by 2021. Obama did not mention excluding any states from his plan.

Public comments are due April 11.

(Editing by Walter Bagley)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Ralphooo wrote:
“It’s fairly unusual for legislation to be written this way, especially for something that is a top priority of the White House.”

Definitely unusual, but this sounds like a good strategy in the current atmosphere of “attack first, think later.”

Mar 22, 2011 10:29am EDT  --  Report as abuse
DrJJJJ wrote:
Drilling in our own waters and in Alaska would do more than increase federal government revenues. Drilling would create hundreds of thousands of jobs, produce billions of dollars in desperately needed state and local tax revenues, supports suffering US industries with low energy costs, keeps prices down at the pumps (that’s more money in your pocket), strengthens their economy, weakens our country’s enemies and much more. Drilling will also increase energy stock values that are owned by American trade unions, private citizens, city and state pension plans, teachers unions, private retirement funds, etc. etc. etc. If we really want health care, we could pay for it with the taxes from US oil. If we really want to reduce the debt then we could pay it down with the taxes from US oil. If we really want to reduce unemployment then we could create jobs with US oil.

Mar 23, 2011 2:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.