UPDATE 1-New York nuke plant seismic review gets top priority

Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:05pm EDT

* Governor wants "long-standing safety questions" answered

* Indian Point plant one of 27 in federal seismic review

* Entergy says its plant is built to withstand any quakes (Adds comments from NRC)

By Dan Wiessner

ALBANY, N.Y., March 22 (Reuters) - U.S. regulators have promised to make the Indian Point nuclear power plant near New York City their top priority in a review of seismic risk at U.S. nuclear plants, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said on Tuesday.

The plant 25 miles (40 km) of New York City, already a source of safety concern among state officials, has faced renewed scrutiny since the March 11 earthquake and tsunami that crippled Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power complex.

Cuomo, a Democrat who has worked to prevent the federal relicensing of the Indian Point facility, said the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has pledged to make the plant its "top priority" as it reviews earthquake risk at 27 nuclear facilities throughout the country.

"It is essential that the NRC move quickly to answer the significant and longstanding safety questions surrounding Indian Point," Cuomo said after New York state officials met with regulators at the NRC's Maryland headquarters.

An NRC report in September found Indian Point was at the greatest risk from seismic activity among the nuclear plants under review. Indian Point sits near two geological fault lines. The plant provides up to 30 percent of New York City's power.

The NRC will be investigating 27 plants' ability to handle earthquakes.

"It is important to note that while the study indicated the seismic risk has increased for some plants, it is not by a margin that would give us cause for any immediate concern," Eliot Brenner, a spokesman for the NRC said in a statement.

Indian Point owner Entergy Corp (ETR.N) purchased a full-page advertisement in The New York Times on Tuesday touting comments by U.S. Energy Secretary Steve Chu saying that the reactor is safe and an NRC report saying all U.S. nuclear plants remain safe.

It was built to withstand an earthquake 100 times the magnitude of any quake measured in the area, Entergy said in the advertisement. The company has pledged to conduct its own review of seismic risk and safety procedures.

Entergy also said it is considering a plan to store mobile emergency generators off-site that could be relocated to Indian Point after any emergency. Reactors at the crippled Japanese plant overheated when the tsunami knocked out backup generators to power the cooling system. The quake had cut off main power.

The NRC has agreed to share data related to seismic risk with the state and will include the governor's staff in on-site reviews of the plant, said Lieutenant Governor Robert Duffy.

"This is an emotional topic, and we want to make sure we have all the facts before we make a decision," said Cuomo, who added that he does not know when the review would take place but that it would be "expeditious."

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
swdude wrote:
Since all seem to agree there is a risk to continued operation of the Indian Point plant, it should be shut down ASAP. Convert the plant to a natural gas plant.

Mar 22, 2011 12:14am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Gulfstate wrote:
We are facing a possible extinction level accident threat and all our leaders can say is we want “long-standing safety questions” answered”. We are all going to die with that attitude. If Indian Point goes, then the NRC and company did far more damage than the terrorists ever could. Why worry about terrorists when we do this to ourselves?

Mar 22, 2011 12:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Are we all living in a collective make believe pretend world? People, if your love your families and love your land, get involved. What is happening in Japan can very well happen here – the instigating factor may not be exactly the same but the causalities can be in the hundreds of thousands. The two ageing reactors are only 25 miles from New York and lie on the intersections of two fault lines according to recent studies done at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. And yes, Indian Point also stores its waste in unprotected steel buildings, just like the ones at Fukushima now spewing poison in a 90-mile radius.

Governor Cuomo’s stance on their decommissioning is totally rational. At least he has the wisdom and fortitude to tackle this head on, even if it is not immediately popular. Indian Point is one of the most dangerous nuclear facilities in the United States. What will people say when the same thing happens in New York? Are we going to say “I kind of sorta wish we did something sooner”?

Entergy’s well-oiled public relations machine has contributed massive sums to both politicos and populace, including tens of thousands of dollars to the coffers of environmental groups such nearby Historic Hudson Valley.

Where there is a will there is a way. With our enemies looking for the ultimate target, what could be more attractive than Indian Point? Another airplane or two would probably be all it would take to start the same cascade of disastrous events.

In case you missed it a couple of weeks ago, a private citizen bought a surplus military jet, flew up the Hudson River, did a few aerobatics and crashed his reconditioned twin engine fighter plane into the Hudson River less than a hundred yards from the heavily populated Kingston Bridge, so it’s apparently not that hard to do. I urge your readers to support the Governor’s initiative.

Mar 23, 2011 2:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.