Japan nuclear crisis drags on but experts hopeful

TOKYO Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:14am EDT

Handout photo from Tokyo Electric Power Co. shows worker attempting to repair power lines at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Tomioka, Fukushima Prefecture northeastern Japan March 18, 2011. Picture taken March 18, 2011. Mandatory credit REUTERS/Tokyo Electric Power Co. via Kyodo/Handout

Handout photo from Tokyo Electric Power Co. shows worker attempting to repair power lines at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Tomioka, Fukushima Prefecture northeastern Japan March 18, 2011. Picture taken March 18, 2011. Mandatory credit

Credit: Reuters/Tokyo Electric Power Co. via Kyodo/Handout

Related Video

TOKYO (Reuters) - Workers battled to staunch radiation leaks at a Japanese nuclear plant on Thursday, almost two weeks after it was disabled by an earthquake and tsunami, but some experts saw signs the crisis was being brought under control.

Hundreds of workers have been desperately trying to cool down the six reactors and spent fuel ponds at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, 240 km (150 miles) north of Tokyo, since the March 11 disaster, including pumping in seawater or dropping water from the air.

Two of the reactors are now seen as safe in what is called a cold shutdown, but the other four sites remain volatile, emitting steam and smoke periodically and raising radiation levels in the vicinity.

But that does not mean the situation is out of control, the experts said.

"The reactors are more stable as time progresses," said Peter Hosemann, a nuclear expert at the University of California, Berkeley.

"By now, the decay heat is greatly reduced and it becomes easier to supply sufficient water for cooling. As far as we know, the containments are holding and the radiation levels have dropped."

But he added: "We might see some more release of radioactive material, mostly due to the water going through the systems."

"The situation is stable but it's still critical. We have some small items of positive news," said Klas Idehaag, reactor inspector at the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority.

Temperatures in reactor 3, for instance, had fallen to 185 degrees Celsius (365.00F) from 225C a day earlier and electricity was working more widely at the plant, he said.

MORE CHALLENGING THAN EXPECTED

Officials at Tokyo Electric Power Co, the plant's operator, said the delay in repairs was at least partly due to underestimates of the damage from the disaster.

Upturned roads, broken pipes and debris hindered transport of equipment and replacement parts, and one official said connecting cables to wet equipment in the dark interior of the reactor buildings had been "far more challenging than expected."

After more than a week, workers managed to connect power to the reactors, but since seawater has been used to cool the plant, checks are needed on all systems before electricity can be switched back on.

Once coolers are switched on, reactor temperatures should fall rapidly and the plant could be on its way to being declared safe, the experts said.

"The problem of testing all the systems has caused some delays," said Tony Irwin, a former nuclear plant manager who now lectures at Australia National University.

"Obviously there must have been quite a lot of building damage. It doesn't seem to be too much of a risk because it all seems to be stable. As soon as you can resume cooling, it should be OK."

"It's much more hopeful than before the weekend...the most difficult thing is keeping the (spent fuel) ponds cool, where they are using fire hoses," said Tony Roulstone, a nuclear energy expert at Cambridge University.

He said that lower levels of radiation were also allowing more workers to join shifts on the site, despite health worries.

A Japanese nuclear expert said the main risk was from continued radiation leaks, and the risk of criticality, or a self-sustaining nuclear reaction, was low.

"The possibility is not zero, since nobody can look inside the reactors to see what is happening," said Yoshiaki Oka, a professor at Tokyo's Waseda University.

"The nuclear fuel rods could cause the reactor core to melt, the core could heat up and melt equipment around it. But as long as we make sure heat is exiting from recirculation pumps and the spent nuclear fuel is covered in water, that risk is remote."

(With extra reporting by Alister Doyle in Oslo, Editing by Michael Watson and Elizabeth Fullerton)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Elektrobahn wrote:
S/B stanch radiation, not staunch radiation. Please mind your spelling.

Mar 24, 2011 8:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
nuclear is good for human kind…

Mar 24, 2011 10:34am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Manaoag10 wrote:
Has anyone tried to boil the radioactive iodine out of the contaminated tap water? What ion exchange resins are available to best remove iodine from water? Adding a soluble silver salt would precipitate some of the iodine as AgI. The AgI is soluble in water at the rate of 0.0000026 gm per liter.

Mar 24, 2011 11:30am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus