Radiation injuries hinder work at Japan's nuclear plant

TOKYO Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:24pm EDT

1 of 21. A woman holds a baby as a family member collects bottles of mineral water at a food distribution in Yamada, Iwate Prefecture in northern Japan, March 24, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Carlos Barria

TOKYO (Reuters) - Radiation injuries to three workers complicated the battle to control Japan's earthquake-damaged nuclear plant while fear of contamination from the world's worst nuclear crisis in 25 years grew both at home and abroad.

Engineers trying to stabilize the six-reactor nuclear power station in Fukushima, 240 km (150 miles) north of Tokyo, have pulled out of some areas of the plant pending safety checks two weeks after an earthquake and tsunami battered the plant.

About 27,400 people are dead or missing across northeast Japan after the March 11 disasters.

Explosions in three reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi power station last week made this the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl in 1986 and raised fears of a catastrophic meltdown.

While that has not happened, radiation has been leaking and four of the plant's reactors are still volatile.

Engineers from the plant's operator, Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO), have made some progress in restoring power needed to cool down overheating nuclear fuel.

But on Thursday, three workers replacing a cable were exposed to high levels of contamination by standing in radioactive water, officials said. Two were taken to hospital with what experts thought could be radiation burns.

A senior official at the country's nuclear safety agency said the accident would delay work.

"We are certainly at a crucial stage right now, so we should try to avoid delays as much as possible, but we also need to ensure that the people working there are safe," agency deputy director general Hidehiko Nishiyama told a news conference.

A TEPCO official said the engineers were working in a volatile environment and needed to be aware of the danger.

"We would like to let those on site know before we resume work," company official Akira Suzuki said on Friday.

The huge loss of life from the 9.0 magnitude earthquake on March 11 and the tsunami it triggered, together with the prospect of a nuclear nightmare, have brought Japan its darkest days since World War Two.

The crisis at the plant has raised apprehension about nuclear power, both in Japan and beyond, and the government of the world's third largest economy would have to review its nuclear power policy, the top government spokesman said.

"It is certain that public confidence in nuclear power plants has greatly changed," Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano told Reuters late on Thursday.

"In light of that, we must first end this situation and then study (it) from a zero base."

Japan's 55 nuclear reactors provide about 30 percent of its electric power. The percentage had been expected to rise to 50 percent by 2030, among the highest in the world.

RADIATION FEARS

Alarm has been spreading about leaking radiation.

Tokyo's 13 million residents were told on Wednesday not to give tap water to babies after contamination hit twice the safety level. But it dropped back to safe levels the next day.

Despite government appeals for people not to panic, many shops saw bottled water flying off the shelves.

"Customers ask us for water. But there's nothing we can do," said Masayoshi Kasahara, a clerk at a Tokyo supermarket. "We are asking for more deliveries, but we don't know when the next shipment will come."

Radiation above safety levels has also been found in milk and vegetables from Fukushima and the Kyodo news agency said radioactive cesium 1.8 times higher than the standard level was found in a leafy vegetable grown at a Tokyo research facility.

Singapore said on Thursday it had found radioactive contaminants in four samples of vegetables from Japan.

Earlier, Singapore and Australia joined the United States and Hong Kong in restricting food and milk imports from the zone, while Canada became the latest of many nations to tighten screening.

The estimated $300 billion damage from the quake and tsunami makes it the world's costliest natural disaster, dwarfing Japan's 1995 Kobe quake and Hurricane Katrina, which swept through New Orleans in 2005.

In Japan's north, more than a quarter of a million people are in shelters. Some elderly displaced people have died from cold and lack of medicines.

Exhausted rescuers are still sifting through the wreckage of towns and villages, retrieving bodies.

The official toll of dead and missing are both revised up every day. Police said on Thursday 9,811 people were confirmed dead and 17,541 were missing. Authorities have been burying unidentified bodies in mass graves.

Amid the suffering, though, there was a sense that Japan was turning the corner in its humanitarian crisis. Aid flowed to refugees, and phone, electricity, postal and bank services began returning to the north, sometimes by makeshift means.

"Things are getting much better," said 57-year-old Tsutomu Hirayama, staying with his family at an evacuation center in Ofunato town.

"For the first two or three days, we had only one rice ball and water for each meal. I thought, how long is this going to go on? Now we get lots of food, it's almost like luxury."

(Additional reporting by Linda Sieg, Sumio Ito, Mayumi Negishi, Shinichi Saoshiro and Kiyoshi Takenaka in Tokyo, Yoko Nishikawa, Jon Herskovitz and Chisa Fujioka in northeast Japan; Writing by Robert Birsel)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
Ectrudert wrote:
The problem, as pointed out in this post [ http://docsgreen.blogspot.com/2011/03/fukushima-nuclear-power-and-coal.html ] is not that nuclear power generation is more dangerous than other power sources (coal is much more dangerous) but that the industry and its regulators are not honest with us. Their assurances that nothing can go wrong are dishonest, incompetent or both. Until we can trust the regulators, and until the industry assumes all costs (instead of passing billions on to the taxpayer) nuclear power generation should is bad policy. (The coal-fired power generation industry should assume all of its costs too, including public health costs due to emissions of particulates and heavy metals.)

Mar 24, 2011 4:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Willie12345 wrote:
Reviewing policy. Now there is a real confidence builder !!!

Mar 24, 2011 5:10pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
nieldevi wrote:
“Japan will have to review its nuclear power policy, its top government spokesman said, as fear of radiation from an earthquake-damaged nuclear complex spread both at home and abroad” – - “an earthquake and tsunami battered the plant and devastated northeastern Japan, leaving about 27,400 people dead or missing” – - Who writes this stuff?? ,,, Does this mean that Japan (whoever that is) must review policy because of fear? ,,, and that because the nuclear complex (whatever that is supposed to make us think) was battered that this is the cause of people’s death and destruction? ,,, And while the headline reads “Injuries to delay work at Japan’s damaged nuclear plant” There is nothing in the article to support that claim. Indeed it states that “It’s still a bit early to make an exact time prognosis, but my guess is in a couple of weeks the reactors will be cool enough to say the crisis is over,” ,,, All the while phrases such as “raised fears”, “revive fears”, and “darkest days since World War Two”. ,,, Or is this just a journal entry for a Geraldo Rivera show

Mar 24, 2011 7:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.