Tokyo Electric likely liable for accident: Japan government

TOKYO | Fri Mar 25, 2011 9:35am EDT

TOKYO (Reuters) - Tokyo Electric Power will likely be held responsible for damages stemming from a nuclear plant that was crippled by this month's massive earthquake and tsunami and has been leaking radiation, Japan's top government spokesman said.

Under Japanese law the operator of a nuclear facility can be granted an exemption from damages caused by a reactor if the accident was deemed to have been triggered by "a grave natural disaster of an exceptional character."

The government has not yet decided whether it would classify the 9.0-magnitude earthquake and tsunami on March 11 as an "exceptional" disaster, even though it killed thousands and total damages could exceed $300 billion.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said it was his view that this exemption would not be applied to the damages caused by Tokyo Electric's Fukushima Daiichi plant. The government has evacuated a 20-km (12-mile) zone around the facility due to radiation concerns.

"From looking at the process and the current situation, it is impossible that Tokyo Electric would easily be exempted from liability for this accident," Edano told a regular briefing on the nuclear crisis on Friday.

Depending on the cause of a nuclear accident, either the government or insurers can be required to provide the first 120 billion yen ($1.47 billion) in liability coverage.

Tokyo Electric would be liable for all damages exceeding that amount if the exemption is not granted. If threatened with financial ruin, however, Tokyo Electric could ask the government for assistance.

Insurers of the stricken nuclear plant have already cited Japan's 1961 Act on Compensation for Nuclear Damage to signal that claims would be unlikely.

Chaucer, one of the world's leading nuclear-risk insurers, has said it expected the act to absolve the operator of liability.

Nuclear Risk Insurers, the underwriting agent for all UK nuclear insurers, has also cited the 1961 act in stating that it did not "anticipate significant losses from this event."

(Editing by Nathan Layne)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
jcwren329 wrote:
Wait, wait, wait. An earthquake AND a tsunami hits this place and the gov’t is going to say the electric company is responsible? Wow. At least it’s not just OUR gov’t that’s corrupted.

Mar 25, 2011 10:46am EDT  --  Report as abuse
stan0301 wrote:
They are certainly responsible for not running in fire hoses to keep water available during the time the plant was running on its emergency batteries following the earthquake–they had a window of opportunity–the consequences of not doing it were apparent–and they didn’t do it.

Mar 25, 2011 11:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
stan0301 wrote:
Tokyo Electric Power CERTAINLY is guilty of not running fire hoses to the points where water would be needed during the period that the facility was running on batteries, and the consequences of what would happen when the batteries ran down was perfectly apparent–Basically the majority of this ongoing incident DIDN’T HAVE TO HAPPEN.

Mar 25, 2011 11:12pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.