IAEA calls nuclear safety summit amid Japan crisis

Related Topics

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano briefs the media after an extraordinary board of governors meeting on the nuclear disaster in Japan at the United Nations headquarters in Vienna March 21, 2011. REUTERS/Herwig Prammer

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Yukiya Amano briefs the media after an extraordinary board of governors meeting on the nuclear disaster in Japan at the United Nations headquarters in Vienna March 21, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Herwig Prammer

VIENNA | Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:56pm EDT

VIENNA (Reuters) - The U.N. atomic energy chief called a Vienna summit to tackle mounting concerns about nuclear safety, saying on Monday the international community needed a coordinated response in the wake of Japan's crisis.

Japan is struggling to avert a severe meltdown at its Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant and officials said highly radioactive water had been leaking from the site hit by an earthquake and tsunami on March 11.

The disaster has prompted a rethink of nuclear power around the world, just as the technology was starting to regain momentum as a tool to fight global warming.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which promotes peaceful uses of nuclear energy, would host the meeting, possibly in June, Director-General Yukiya Amano said.

He said ministers from 151 IAEA member states should attend.

"(The) political level is needed, this is a very important issue, this is not only for experts or technical people," he told a news conference.

Amano said the Vienna conference would discuss the initial assessment of the Japanese accident and look at where things went wrong. It would also focus on boosting atomic safety and seek ways to improve nuclear crisis-management.

The IAEA has been criticized in the media and privately by diplomats for being too slow to react to the crisis.

The agency has said it can only communicate the data Japan gives it and says it lacks the power to enforce nuclear safety standards, something it may now lobby to change.

Amano described the situation at the site as "very serious."

"The difficult situation has not been overcome and it will take time to stabilize the reactors. Radioactivity in the environment, foodstuffs and water is a matter of concern in the vicinity of the Fukushima plant and beyond," he said.

RADIOACTIVE WATER

IAEA officials said they were especially concerned about pools of radioactive water that have accumulated in the plant.

"This water in the turbines... is also for us maybe now the big concern," IAEA official Miroslav Lipar said.

The radiation appeared to be coming from damaged fuel that was escaping from containment vessels even though the reactor cores seemed largely intact, officials said.

"I think that from pressure readings our feeling is this is not a major breach of the reactor pressure vessel or the primary containment vessel, but we don't know that for certain," Amano deputy Graham Andrew said.

Two subcontractors hospitalized for radiation exposure after stepping into the pools were released on Monday, the IAEA said.

Andrew said weekend tests in six Japanese prefectures had detected radioactive iodine in asparagus, celery, cabbage, chives, cucumbers, eggplant, leeks, mushrooms, parsley, tomatoes, spinach and other leafy vegetables, strawberries and watermelon.

One sample of hana wasabi taken last week in Fukushima showed unacceptably high levels of iodine and cesium, he said.

Andrew said it was too early to draw conclusions about the impact of contaminated seawater on marine food.

Officials played down news that Fukushima's operator had found reactor-grade plutonium in soil at the plant.

"It means that there is degradation of the fuel, which is not news. We have been saying that consistently for so many days," IAEA safety chief Denis Flory told reporters.

(Editing by Mark Heinrich)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
“possibly in June”
that’s a joke right?
One month from now, and it’s not certain, just a possibility?
Certainly pounding Libya is much more useful…

Mar 28, 2011 2:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
the_piano_man wrote:
Plutonium 239 has a half-life of 24,100 years. See the info here:
http://hypertextbook.com/facts/JaniceChing.shtml
and here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium-239
and here
http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search/r?dbs+hsdb:@term+@na+@rel+plutonium,+radioactive
Although there may not be lots of it at nuclear power plants, there is enough to be harmful over short periods of time. This, alone, makes nuclear power unacceptable, period – because humans are not perfect, and accidents will happen, that is an undeniable truth that only an idiot will ignore. We do not have to choose only between nuclear, and petrol power, but that is the “straw man” argument put forth by those who make lots of money producing power. Conservation, solar power, wind power, tidal power, hydrogen power and geothermal power are all viable options – they just don’t make people uber rich. This earth already has too many nuclear power plants and too much petrol produced power, we are so far over the limit now.

Mar 28, 2011 3:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
morristhewise wrote:
Radiation exposure from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Plant can be a Japanese woman’s worst nightmare, it can result in the loss of her hair. Losing one`s hair affects a woman most, their self image is often based on her hairstyle. Fortunately when the radiation is normalized the hair will grow back.

Mar 28, 2011 3:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.