Qihoo 360 shares more than double in NYSE debut

NEW YORK | Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:29pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The shares of Qihoo 360 Technology Co Ltd, China's third most-popular Internet company, soared in their debut on the New York Stock Exchange on Wednesday in an echo of the Chinese technology IPO euphoria of late 2010.

Qihoo's shares more than doubled to $34 after the company priced the offering $2 above the originally proposed range on Tuesday.

U.S. investors have been attracted to Chinese Internet companies, eager to cash in on the booming growth of the number of Chinese Web users and the country's economy.

Qihoo 360 opens the door to tapping that market: It said it was China's leading provider of Internet and mobile security products and maker of the second most-popular Web browser, behind Microsoft Corp's Internet Explorer.

Although so far this year Chinese IPOs have seen little traction, Qihoo's $176 million IPO comes on the heels of a rush of similar Chinese Internet companies in the fourth quarter, such as online video company Youku.com Inc and Internet retailer E Commerce China Dangdang Inc.

The shares of both companies also soared in their NYSE debuts in December, rising 161 percent and 87 percent, respectively. Youku has since risen another 34 percent, while Dangdang erased some gains to trade 39 percent above the IPO price.

"The macro environment for Chinese stocks in general is very good," said Josef Schuster, founder of Chicago-based IPO investment firm IPOX Schuster LLC. "(Qihoo) is also pure technology, this is a hot sector."

Beijing-based Qihoo 360 and its stockholders planned to sell 12.1 million shares for $10.50 to $12.50 each, but then expected to raise pricing suggestions to a range of $13.50 to $14.50 because of "significant" investor demand, a source with direct knowledge of the IPO plans told Reuters at the time.

The source also said venture capital and private equity firms Sequoia Capital, Highland Capital Partners, Trustbridge Partners and CDH Investments agreed to buy $50 million of the company's shares in a concurrent private placement.

Qihoo 360's revenue increased 78.5 percent to $57.7 million in 2010 from the year before and almost doubled from 2008 to 2009, according to a filing with U.S. regulators.

The company became profitable over 2009, and its net income more than doubled to $8.5 million in 2010. Net income attributable to shareholders was 5 cents per share in 2010, up from 3 cents in 2009 and a 7 cent loss in 2008.

UBS Investment Bank and Citigroup Inc led underwriters on the IPO.

(Reporting by Alina Selyukh; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn, Andre Grenon and Steve Orlofsky)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
EllieK wrote:
One wonders if there is any company, anywhere, that Sequoia Capital doesn’t own a piece of.

This is a bit of a gamble here on Qihoo, but I’m guessing that it isn’t atypical performance when considered in the context of first, or second, or third day IPO activity. Well, doubling in price is still on the buoyant side of the distribution.

As with other such IPO’s, it will probably experience a drop quickly enough, and we’ll only know if the fundamentals of the company justified this sort of enthusiastic reception once Qihoo 360 (and the market) determines its steady-state.

Apr 01, 2011 4:12am EDT  --  Report as abuse
EllieK wrote:
UBS and Citigroup clients are no doubt very happy today.

I wonder what other financial entities, particularly China domiciled, were part of the syndicate that brought Qihoo 360 IPO to market?

Apr 01, 2011 4:15am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.