GE defends itself in U.S. tax flare-up

Jeff Immelt, Chairman and CEO of GE and recently appointed Chairman of the U.S. Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, speaks to business leaders at a Chamber of Commerce luncheon in Calgary, Alberta, February 25, 2011. REUTERS/Todd Korol

Jeff Immelt, Chairman and CEO of GE and recently appointed Chairman of the U.S. Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, speaks to business leaders at a Chamber of Commerce luncheon in Calgary, Alberta, February 25, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Todd Korol

WASHINGTON | Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:38pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - General Electric Co (GE.N) went on the defensive on Thursday over a report it paid no income taxes in 2010, unapologetically saying it seeks to reduce what it owes, but expects to pay more this year.

Chief Executive Jeff Immelt said people who assert the corporate tax controversy damages his credibility as head of a White House panel on job creation and economic competitiveness can "think what they think."

"I am completely committed to do a good job," Immelt told ABC News after addressing political and business leaders at the Washington Economic Club.

The New York Times reported last week that GE owed nothing in federal income taxes in 2010 despite earning $14 billion, about a third from its U.S. operations.

The company said, however, it expects to owe the government a small amount in 2010 when it files its return in September. GE also said it paid about $1 billion in other federal, state and local taxes.

The report has fueled criticism from some quarters, including labor groups, that GE and other corporations receive special treatment from the government while millions of Americans struggle in a tough economy.

It also led former Sen. Russ Feingold, a liberal Democrat still vocal on labor issues nationwide, to call on President Barack Obama to dump Immelt from the White House panel on job creation.

The White House fended off questions about whether Immelt should sit on the panel, saying the best way to address the matter is to change the tax code, which Immelt said was outdated and overly complex.

"The president has made clear that he believes we need to reform our corporate tax system," White House spokesman Jay Carney said on Thursday. "He believes that we can lower our corporate tax rate without diminishing revenues if we go after a lot of loopholes that exist, a lot of the complexity."

Immelt said GE, like other businesses, seeks low tax rates. But he stressed the company is fully compliant with federal regulations.

"There are no exceptions," he said.

Immelt said a small tax bill for 2010 was due to more than $30 billion in losses related to GE's financial services business during the financial crisis. In 2009, GE Capital's losses were so large that it company overall lost money on its U.S. operations.

GE's federal taxes, Immelt said, would rise as the performance of its financial arm improves.

Immelt said it was important that "everyone pay their fair share" and noted that GE had paid billions in federal, state and local taxes over the past several years.

Terry Madonna, a political scientist at Franklin and Marshall College in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, said part of the political backlash Immelt faces stems from the fact GE Capital received U.S. government debt guarantees during the financial crisis. It left the debt program in 2009.

On the tax issue, Madonna said the problem "seems to me to be inherent in the tax code."

(Additional reporting by Caren Bohan; editing by Matthew Lewis, Gary Hill and Andre Grenon)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
ROWnine wrote:
GE is a prime example of why free trade not fair trade is flawed. We allow GE to import its products into the US with little or no tariffs (based on a value far less than the wholesale or retail cost upon import) from countries that don’t require much environmental control and who allow scab labor rates comparable to that countries virtual slave labor market. Then the US tax payer funds the customs exam, maintains the transportation ports, hubs, and roads and other infrastructure and a lion share of the profits are claimed on the books overseas. Then the US taxpayer provides patent services, courts, access to our stock market and tax incentives for development and research. When the US was buying most of its product from Industrialized Great Briton at least our Federal Government was smart enough to charge tariffs sufficient to not have income taxes. Now that we have allowed our increasingly undemocratic capitalists to transfer the means of production to the communist capitalists let’s have a moment of silence for all the men and women who gave their lives to secure our necessary trade routes and who ran the engine of democracy before companies like GE moved it offshore. Instead of creating jobs put these great minds to the test in war games. Let them decide how we win if China decides to cut off lending, shuts down their string of pearls closes down their coast and sends out a fleet of aircraft carriers that deploy only cruise missiles and vastly upgraded silkworms in sufficient numbers to overwhelm aegis systems. Ask them how Americas industrial might will counter this nightmare by producing wave upon wave of super technical aircraft and ships and aircraft that can move men machines faster than the tankers they possess and the aircraft they are building with the help of Airbus and Boeing. Sun Tzu said to beat your enemy from within by the use of spies (they use them industrial, governmental and cyber), by causing splits in their alliances (How that Egypt thing going) and not through combat (well once they don’t yet have the air fleet but they are trying). Effin Nixon I’m glad the Cubans spit on him at least he got the mob out of Cuba.

Mar 31, 2011 9:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Acetracy wrote:
Thanks to the New York Times for making GE’s free ride a front page news item. At a time when the US is waging 2 wars, the conservative think tanks like American Heritage, Cato, Hoover, etc. continue to harp that the US corporate tax rate is too high. The effective tax rate is something like 18% versus the nominal rate of 35%. Bit by bit corporate taxes are falling dramatically.

Amazon skips out on collecting sales taxes throughout the US yet pays less than 5% in Federal income taxes. Google pays around 2.5%. What we see is that the most profitable companies and fastest growing are in part doing so well at the expense of the US middle class that has seen flat wages and rising taxes.

The solution? A flat tax on corporate America. Put a 20% tax on worldwide EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation) with no exception. And couple that with an Alternative Minimum Tax of 5% on net annual cash flow so that no corporation gets away with paying -0-.

Apr 01, 2011 10:12am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.