Lawmaker has concerns over mobile megamerger

WASHINGTON Fri Apr 1, 2011 1:15pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. lawmaker with oversight of technology expressed concern that AT&T Inc's plans to take over T-Mobile USA would stifle innovation in the wireless market.

Representative Greg Walden, chairman of the House subcommittee on communications and technology, said he did not want to see a merger diminish the vibrant and competitive nature of wireless.

AT&T's $39 billion bid to buy Deutsche Telekom AG's T-Mobile USA would concentrate 80 percent of U.S. wireless contract customers in just two companies -- AT&T/T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless, a joint venture of Verizon Communications and Vodafone Group Plc.

AT&T, currently the No. 2 U.S. mobile carrier behind Verizon, has said the merger will spur innovation and economic growth by improving quality and expanding wireless service to 95 percent of Americans.

But Walden expressed concern about eliminating a national carrier.

"It seems to me if there are fewer and fewer players in a market, there's less and less opportunity for that creative innovation and invention that has occurred so far in the wireless market," he said at an event sponsored by news service Politico Pro.

The merger needs the approval of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission and the Justice Department and the process is expected to take at least a year.

Walden has no direct input into those reviews but his subcommittee has oversight of the FCC, and he did not rule out hearings on the merger proposal.

He said his panel would be very critical of the FCC's merger review process, checking for potential abuses of power.

Walden criticized agencies that use their authority over mergers to "extort policy changes."

Congress may have to step in, Walden said, with tighter definitions on agencies' authority over mergers.

"The FCC needs to look in the mirror on this one because we're going to come at them very strongly, very forcefully," he added.


AT&T could face a tough battle at the FCC.

FCC Commissioner Michael Copps said at the onset of the Comcast-NBCU merger that it would be a tough sell. That transaction won a majority of the FCC members' approval, but Copps voted against it.

He said in an interview this week for C-SPAN television's "The Communicators," that AT&T's proposal "may be an even steeper climb" and that the deal "sucks the oxygen" out of other issues before the FCC, especially spectrum reform.

But Walden said this was not a concern for him. "I think we're all fairly capable of multi-tasking, and a lot of work goes on even if a hearing isn't announced or scheduled," he said.

The FCC wants Congress to grant it authority to hold incentive auctions that would compensate broadcasters for giving up some of their spectrum to wireless companies.

The agency also wants lawmakers to consent to giving a highly sought after chunk of U.S. airwaves known as the D Block to public safety groups to build out a nationwide mobile broadband network for emergency services.

Walden, a former broadcaster, said he hoped a bipartisan consensus could be reached as spectrum reform is likely to drive innovation, but he was wary of acting too quickly.

"We're going to have a series of hearings to get all these issues out in the open. We're not going to cram something through," he said.

(Reporting by Jasmin Melvin; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
electric38 wrote:
America clearly sees what happens when competition is stifled, or any type of product is taken over by a single entity. A glut of excess profit occurs at the expense of all Americans. Low cost streaming TV and online education rely on mobile applications. Tax subsidies were given (from every working Americans pocket) to help build the communications infrastructure. Congress is correct in protecting our stake in it by demanding multiply dispersed and fair competition.

Apr 01, 2011 5:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
trajan52 wrote:
It doesn’t seem to matter if it is one mega-company or a series of corporations. The competition of the past is gone. Now, companies simply wait to see what each of their offers are, and basically match the rates instead of forcing prices down through true competition.

It is the most insidious form of collusion and will only get worse.

Apr 03, 2011 10:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
The real parasites today are the politicians who posture and make it look like they are trying to do what is in the best interest of the people, all the while they are in bed with the corporations. Does anyone want to wager that this will go through?

Apr 04, 2011 7:09am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.