Bonds' urine sample tested positive for steroids: lab chief

Related Topics

SAN FRANCISCO | Tue Apr 5, 2011 4:35pm EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A urine sample that baseball home run king Barry Bonds submitted in 2003 was positive for banned performance enhancing drugs, the former director of a University of California Lab said Tuesday in Bonds' perjury trial.

Describing a test performed on the sample three years later, UCLA Olympic Lab former chief Don Catlin said, "it means that it contains drugs, or metabolites that should not be there."

Bonds has pleaded not guilty to lying to a grand jury in a 2003 investigation of illegal use of performance-enhancing drugs in sports, and prosecutors say they will prove their case by showing he did in fact take steroids.

The urine sample contained both tetrahydrogestrinone (THG), a steroid that prosecutors say was designed to avoid detection, and clomiphene, which suppresses the hormone estrogen, potentially increasing the production of testosterone.

The bald, grandfatherly Catlin, who designed testing procedures to identify the drugs, commented simply that tests performed on the drugs were positive.

His testimony followed a series of witnesses over the past week who described the journey of the urine sample from the San Francisco Giants clubhouse where Bonds gave the sample, to the University of California Olympic Analytical Laboratory.

The sample was at first found negative by Quest Diagnostics, but an Internal Revenue Service agent seized it as part of the agency's investigation into the Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative, and took it to the UCLA lab. There, a more sophisticated test detected the drugs, Catlin testified.

The charges in the Bonds case stem from his 2003 appearance before a U.S. grand jury investigating BALCO, whose head pleaded guilty to dispensing steroids to professional athletes, a national scandal.

While playing for the San Francisco Giants, Bonds broke Hank Aaron's 33-year-old career home run record in August 2007. Three months, later a grand jury indicted him for perjury and obstruction of justice.

Bonds told the grand jury he did not knowingly use steroids or growth hormones and said he never questioned the flaxseed oil, vitamins, protein shakes and creams his trainer supplied him.

The case in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California is United States of America v. Barry Lamar Bonds, 07-cr-732.

(Editing by Peter Henderson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
CDShaffer wrote:
Did Barry Bonds lie about using performance enhancing drugs? His shoe size grew. His HAT size grew! Yes. Barry Bonds lied about using performance enhancing drugs.

Apr 05, 2011 5:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
cmonman wrote:
Okay, we are upset at Barry Bonds for what? Lying about having NOT KNOWINGLY using steroids? People get a life, he was a PRO ball player! He was paid to hit home runs and he did more than anyone else. I am tired of the judging. Hell he did the MLB a favor; he filled seats, he kept the fans wanting more. Hell baseball is boring since the sluggers left. If they want to use performance enhancers let them! It is their lives not ours. I don’t fault him for trying to get ahead in his trade…in all other occupations it’s called ambition!

Apr 05, 2011 5:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
cmonman wrote:
My question is why are we wasting tax dollars on this? And why isn’t their indictments on pro bodybuilders? Bodybuilders openly use them and NONE of them goes to jail…Hypocrites.

Apr 05, 2011 5:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.