FAA sets stringent checks of older 737s

WASHINGTON/ATLANTA Tue Apr 5, 2011 5:53pm EDT

Southwest mechanics work on a Boeing 737 inside a hanger at the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, April 2, 2011. REUTERS/Rick Scuteri

Southwest mechanics work on a Boeing 737 inside a hanger at the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, April 2, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Rick Scuteri

Related Topics

WASHINGTON/ATLANTA (Reuters) - U.S. regulators on Tuesday ordered airlines to inspect older model Boeing Co 737 aircraft for cracks, a step prompted by a Southwest Airlines Co jet that landed with a fuselage hole.

The most urgent Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement covers about 175 of the most heavily used planes worldwide.

Checks of those jets must be completed within five days of the airline receiving the order and repeated before they total another 500 takeoffs and landings.

Eventually, the agency wants checks on more of the "classic" 737-300, 400 and 500 planes to undergo the time-consuming electromagnetic metal fatigue inspections before they reach a certain number of takeoffs and landings.

The inspections aim to detect cracks along joints in the fuselage that bond layers of aircraft skin which cannot be seen visually.

Paul Richter, chief project engineer for 737 "classic" at Boeing, told a media briefing on Tuesday the fatigue cracks suspected in the Southwest rupture occurred sooner than Boeing expected in the life of the plane.

Boeing issued a bulletin to its operators outlining the inspection requirements that were narrower and less stringent than the FAA directive.

The aircraft involved in the April 1 event performed more than 39,000 takeoffs and landings, Southwest said. An industry source with knowledge of the Boeing bulletin said that total was higher than average for a plane of its age -- around 15 years.

Flight 812 was heading from Phoenix to Sacramento, California, when a 5-foot tear opened up 20 minutes after takeoff along the roof just above the left wing.

The most demanding part of the FAA order was based on an inspection regimen launched by Southwest after last week's incident and completed on Tuesday.

Southwest grounded and inspected more than 70 planes over four days, discovering cracks in five that require repairs, the carrier said.

Boeing believed there was nothing about how Southwest operates planes that may have contributed to the April 1 incident, Richter said.

"It's just a statistical event far more than it has anything to do with Southwest and how they operate the airplane," Richter said.

Safety experts have questioned whether the aggressive way in which Southwest uses its planes -- quick turnarounds and short hops -- may accelerate wear.

Southwest returned to a normal schedule on Tuesday after canceling more than 650 flights over the weekend and on Monday.

Southwest shares fell 26 cents, or 2.1 percent, to close at $12.20, and Boeing was off 72 cents, or about 1 percent, at $72.23.

(Reporting by John Crawley, with additional reporting by Karen Jacobs in Atlanta and Tim Hepher in Paris; Editing by Derek Caney, Richard Chang, Gary Hill)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
wigglwagon wrote:
“The Federal Aviation Administration directive on 737-300, 400, and 500 fuselage inspections, expected on Tuesday, will apply to the most frequently flown models. It involves a time consuming and repetitive electromagnetic check not previously required for the area of the plane in question.”

That has to be expensive. The FAA should stay out of it. The airlines can regulate themselves.

Apr 04, 2011 9:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Matt-BNA wrote:
For what it’s worth, the aircraft in the photo above is not a 737-300 – it’s a 737-700, which is one of the newer “Next Generation” models that is not involved in any of these issues.

Apr 04, 2011 9:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Tiven wrote:
You — Reuters aviation writers–need to look at the system or non-system for checking older 737’s flying across Africa and the Asian subcontinent. I have been on some 737-200’s, the one’s with the skinny engine nacelles. Same for DC9’s and early MD 85 (well, all the same really) that have gone to Africa to die. To paraphrase woody Allen, I;’m not afraid of flying, I just don’t want to be on the plane that crashes.

Apr 05, 2011 11:08am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.