Judge overturns $625 million Apple patent award

Related Topics

A staff member holds the new Apple iPad2 at the Apple store in London March 25, 2011. REUTERS/Luke MacGregor

A staff member holds the new Apple iPad2 at the Apple store in London March 25, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Luke MacGregor

NEW YORK | Wed Apr 6, 2011 9:17am EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A Texas judge has overturned a $625 million patent infringement award against Apple Inc, saying the jury erred in finding the maker of Mac computers used technology owned by Mirror Worlds LLC illegally.

Mirror Worlds had argued that several features on Apple's computers -- Spotlight, Cover Flow and Time Machine -- used its own patented software for archiving and displaying documents.

A jury in federal court in Tyler, Texas -- which often handles complex patent cases -- last year found that Apple infringed three of Mirror Worlds' patents, awarding the company $208.5 million for each patent, or $625.5 million overall.

Apple appealed the verdict, and the court on Monday granted its request to strike the award, saying Mirror Worlds did not provide enough evidence in the trial.

"Mirror Worlds may have painted an appealing picture for the jury, but it failed to lay a solid foundation sufficient to support important elements it was required to establish under the law," said federal judge Leonard Davis in the ruling.

He also denied Apple's request for a new trial.

Apple did not reply to a request for comment. Mirror Worlds could not immediately be reached.

The case is 6:08-cv-00088-LED in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler division.

(Reporting by Bill Rigby; Editing by Gary Hill)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
IPLAW wrote:
Why would Apple want a retrial if they won?

Apr 05, 2011 10:18pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
m3kw wrote:
They mean they denied Mirror Worlds for a retrail.

Apr 05, 2011 11:18pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
vschla wrote:
I’m a little confused at how a judge can say Apple infringed on patents, but does not have to pay anything as a pentetly. I understand that Mirror Worlds may not have created a very strong case legally, but a patent is a patent. Isn’t that evidence enough?

Apr 06, 2011 4:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.