Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Ballot find threatens to upend Wisconsin election

Related Topics

Demonstrators march around the State Capitol building as they protest against budget cuts from Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, in Madison February 25, 2011. REUTERS/Darren Hauck

Demonstrators march around the State Capitol building as they protest against budget cuts from Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, in Madison February 25, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Darren Hauck

MADISON, Wis | Thu Apr 7, 2011 7:52pm EDT

MADISON, Wis (Reuters) - Officials in Waukesha County on Thursday said a final review of paperwork and records from a closely watched Wisconsin Supreme Court election uncovered thousands of uncounted votes, a potentially stunning development that could upend the contest.

Unofficial returns on Wednesday gave the union-backed challenger, JoAnne Kloppenburg, a narrow 204-vote statewide lead over Republican David Prosser.

But late Thursday, the county clerk in Waukesha, a Republican stronghold, said workers had found 7,582 votes uncounted votes for Prosser.

News of the uncounted votes came as officials throughout Wisconsin were conducting county canvasses, a final review of voting records that allows the state to certify this week's bitterly contested elections.

The contest was widely seen as a referendum on Republican Governor Scott Walker and the controversial curbs on collective bargaining that he and his allies passed in the legislature.

Because Prosser is a Republican who expressed support for Walker last fall, opponents characterized him as a proxy for the governor and his anti-union policies, which triggered massive protests and 16 recall campaigns targeting lawmakers who supported and opposed the measure.

Kathy Nickolaus, the Waukesha clerk, apologized for the uncounted votes and blamed "human error."

She said at a news conference that she had failed to properly save a spreadsheet showing one town's voting results.

"I'm thankful that this error was caught early in the process and during the canvass," Nickolaus said. "The purpose of the canvass is to catch these kinds of errors."

Even before the Waukesha clerk announced her discovery, any certification was unlikely to bring closure in the passionately fought contest, where the razor-thin margin Kloppenburg had used to claim victory was certain to lead to a recount.

It would be the first statewide recount in Wisconsin in more than 20 years and could begin next week if Prosser, a former member of the assembly, requests it.

To help officials prepare, the state's Government Accountability Board sent out a memo stressing that local officials needed to "maintain all memory device and programing for the April 5, 2011 Spring Election in its original form."

"We are in unprecedented times in many respects," the memo read, "but particularly with regard to a potential statewide recount, which has not occurred since 1989 ... A thorough completion of the County Board of Canvass at this time may reconcile inconsistencies and issues that will likely save you time and effort in the pending recount process."

(Reporting by Jeff Mayers and James B. Kelleher; editing by Tim Gaynor and Ellen Wulfhorst)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (39)
TomMariner wrote:
“Union-backed challenger for seat on Wisconsin Supreme Court?”

I though legislators were elected to make partisan decisions on laws they pass, but judges were supposed to make judgments based on law? In Wisconsin is the court system just an extension of the political parties? If I’m a Republican I get to win my case every time? If I’m a liberal or a conservative, my case will get decided on whether the judge’s philosophy is the same as mine ???

Yeah, let’s get to the part about being a country of laws where impartial justice is meted out. At least there will be no wondering about how the “challenger” will rule in most of his cases.

Apr 07, 2011 9:21am EDT  --  Report as abuse
pappawtom wrote:
It will be interesting to see if this new judge, if the count stands, does consider the possible law as an impartial judge. If not then it will be a sad day for Wisconsin’s voters. This law has galvanized the voters and this prosecuter got into the race because of her opinion about the law.

Apr 07, 2011 9:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
danjoe22 wrote:
In Wisconsin is the court system just an extension of the political parties? Not just in Wisconsin, the whole country, including the Supreme Court. Witness the 2000 presidential election.

Apr 07, 2011 9:31am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.