Sponsored Links

Washington state nuclear plant briefly evacuated

SEATTLE, April 8 | Fri Apr 8, 2011 4:47pm EDT

SEATTLE, April 8 (Reuters) - Washington state's only nuclear power plant briefly evacuated about 25 workers after a small amount of hydrogen sprang from a pipe and ignited in a six-inch (15.5 cm) flash, plant officials said on Friday.

The incident at the Columbia Generating Station late on Thursday afternoon resulted in no injuries or equipment damage, they said. Workers are now back.

"It was like a little flash, like what you would see when lighting a barbecue," said Rochelle Olson, spokeswoman for the plant which is operated by Energy Northwest.

The nuclear reactor at the plant was shut down at the time for routine maintenance and refueling.

The plant, in Richland, Washington, about 210 miles (338 km) southeast of Seattle, said the incident occurred in the main turbine building.

Workers were cutting a pipe after closing and purging it, when a small amount of residual trapped hydrogen gas was released and ignited, officials said in a statement, describing the release as a "less-than-one-second puff."

"It's such a minor event that it wouldn't be reported in any other industry," Olson added. (Reporting by Laura L. Myers; editing by Alex Dobuzinskis and Chris Michaud)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
torontodude wrote:
There are significant problems with the plant’s version of things.
One – why evacuate 25 workers for a 1 second event compared to lighting your barbeque?
Two – hydrogen burns with a virtually invisible flame, so the account of a puff is problematic as well as the 6″ it refers to.
Three- the pipe was described as having been purged – but if so, then there can be no possible residual hydrogen gas. If there was, then the pipe was not purged properly. Properly used, as it certainly should have been if the pipe had truly been purged, an explosive gas detector would have detected any residual gas.
This is easy to see when you are in the industry as I am. I have to wonder why this deception from the plant, and what really happened. . .

Apr 09, 2011 12:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
torontodude wrote:
There are at least 3 glaring inconsistencies with this explanation given by the plant spokesperson.

Apr 09, 2011 12:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.