NYSE snubs Nasdaq, sticks with Deutsche Boerse deal

NEW YORK Sun Apr 10, 2011 7:56pm EDT

Nasdaq OMX signs are seen inside their studios at Times Square in New York April 1, 2011. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

Nasdaq OMX signs are seen inside their studios at Times Square in New York April 1, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

NEW YORK (Reuters) - NYSE Euronext stuck to its deal with Deutsche Boerse AG over a higher takeover bid from Nasdaq OMX Group, calling the rival offer too risky and counter to the Big Board's vision.

The NYSE board's decision on Sunday smacks the ball back in the court of Nasdaq, which with partner IntercontinentalExchange Inc will have to decide whether to appeal directly to NYSE shareholders, raise the $11.3 billion bid, or walk away.

Perhaps setting the tone for what could be a drawn-out bidding process, NYSE Euronext Chief Executive Duncan Niederauer criticized Nasdaq's unsolicited bid as hollow and undefined, saying it would unacceptably carve up his transatlantic exchange operator.

"It's hard to call it an offer because it's a loosely worded proposal that was, in our minds, an empty vessel," he said in an interview.

"We had a strategy. The combination with Deutsche Boerse is consistent with that strategy. A dismantling of the company is not. End of story," added Niederauer, who would take the reins of a combined Deutsche Boerse-NYSE Euronext.

The formal rejection comes nine days after Nasdaq and ICE unveiled their plan, arguing it would strengthen the United States' hand as the world's bourses scramble to band together to fend off smaller rivals and find new profits.

On Sunday, Nasdaq said the NYSE board's decision "does not reflect the best interests of their shareholders."

But NYSE Euronext's directors, which oversee the Big Board and a handful of European exchanges, found the bid from Nasdaq and ICE "strategically unattractive, with unacceptable execution risk" -- a reference to the antitrust concerns that could come between NYSE and Nasdaq, the top two U.S. exchanges.

The friendly, $10.2 billion deal with Germany's Deutsche Boerse was in shareholders' long-term interest, and "significantly more likely" to be completed, the board said. That merger, announced in February, would create the world's biggest exchange operator.

The counteroffer would give Nasdaq stock exchanges in New York, Amsterdam, Brussels, Lisbon and Paris, as well as U.S. options platforms and technology, while Atlanta-based ICE would get NYSE Euronext's London-based Liffe platform and other derivative businesses.

"Breaking up NYSE Euronext, burdening the pieces with high levels of debt, and destroying its invaluable human capital, would be a strategic mistake in terms of where the global markets are going, and is clearly not in the best interests of our shareholders," NYSE Euronext Chairman Jan-Michiel Hessels said in a statement.

ICE did not immediately comment.

The battle for the parent of the venerable New York Stock Exchange has boosted its shares more than 15 percent. Now, shareholders could face more weeks of uncertainty as the exchanges reposition themselves.

Though linking with Deutsche Boerse may be a better long-term plan, Nasdaq and ICE may be able to convince NYSE shareholders that their proposition is better in the short term, said Brendan Caldwell, president of Toronto-based Caldwell Investment Management Ltd, which holds NYSE shares.

"With the increasing uncertainty in the marketplace, the short term becomes more important," he said.

Niederauer, a fierce rival of Nasdaq counterpart Robert Greifeld, tamped down speculation that a bidding war could ensue, arguing Deutsche Boerse did not technically bid for NYSE Euronext. "It's not clear to me that it will escalate because I don't know what would escalate from here," he said.

LAUNDRY LIST

NYSE Euronext directors were concerned that Nasdaq and ICE had failed to line up committed bank financing for their bid, and that a takeover could saddle the combined entities with too much debt, a person familiar with the board's thinking said.

Directors also worried that a Nasdaq-NYSE merger could cost too many jobs in New York City, the person added. The person requested anonymity because of a lack of authority to speak for NYSE Euronext.

In announcing their cash-and-stock bid on April 1, Nasdaq and ICE had valued NYSE Euronext at $42.50 per share, 12 percent above Deutsche Boerse's offer.

In a separate statement, Deutsche Boerse said the merger remains "on track" to close by the end of the year.

Niederauer said Deutsche Boerse's CEO Reto Francioni, who would be chairman of the combined entity, is set to visit New York this week, and that the companies would attempt to outline more clearly the benefits of their tie-up plan.

Both proposed deals are certain to attract antitrust scrutiny, which has also emerged as a hurdle for other potential exchange mergers.

On Friday, Singapore Exchange Ltd ended a takeover bid for exchange operator ASX Ltd after Australia's government rejected that offer.

An NYSE Euronext merger with Deutsche Boerse would likely draw regulatory scrutiny over the combined companies' expected dominance in European derivatives trading and clearing.

Similarly, merging Nasdaq with the NYSE could prompt U.S. antitrust issues, given that the largest U.S. stock exchanges would have a virtual monopoly on listings and dominance in trading U.S. cash equities and options.

Greifeld, Nasdaq's CEO, has called any potential antitrust issues "manageable".

In Friday trading on U.S. markets, NYSE Euronext shares closed at $38.70, Nasdaq OMX at $28.45 and ICE at $120.55.

(Additional reporting by Paritosh Bansal in New York and Harro ten Wolde in Frankfurt; Editing by Gary Crosse, Gunna Dickson and Dale Hudson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
enjoytheride wrote:
To turn down a higher bid, a board needs some very solid reasons rather than a bunch of intangible (aka hard-to-prove) reasons. Failing to do that, the board should be vetoed out since it aligns its interest against the interest of the shareholders.

What is the rush to kill the higher bid? If nothing else, it makes the lower bid to “man up” and show the money – thus shareholders get MORE not LESS money. Are we in this to make money or to feed the fat cats in the board.

The board was not able to invite a higher bid in the first place and now eagerly killing the higher bid with a bunch fluffy reasons. It is clear which side the board sleeps with!

The board has to go!

I’m voting them all out — unless individual board member would come forward and announce “yes” vote to go with the higher bid of NASDQ instead of the lower bid of Deutsche Boerse.

Apr 10, 2011 4:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.