U.S. judge keeps protections in place for endangered wolves

Related Topics

SALMON, Idaho | Sat Apr 9, 2011 11:20pm EDT

SALMON, Idaho (Reuters) - A federal judge on Saturday rejected a plan negotiated between the government and wildlife advocates to remove most wolves in the Northern Rockies from the Endangered Species List.

The deal struck earlier this month between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and 10 conservation groups would have lifted federal protections from an estimated 1,200 wolves in Idaho and Montana, allowing those states to restore licensed hunting of the animals.

A similar plan for removing Endangered Species Act safeguards for wolves in Montana and Idaho, and turning management of the animals over to state game officials, was implemented by the federal government in 2009.

But 14 conservation groups challenged that move in court, and a U.S. district judge in Missoula, Montana, sided with the environmentalists in August of 2010, ordering federal protections of the wolves restored.

The same judge, Donald Molloy, refused Saturday to approve the latest de-listing plan, which 10 of the 14 conservation groups had hammered out with the Obama administration. The four remaining groups opposed the settlement.

They said in legal filings that supporters of the proposed settlement were improperly being driven by a wish to lessen the public conflict over wolves, rather than by science.

Powerful ranching interests in Montana and Idaho opposed reintroduction of wolves to the region some 15 years ago and have continued to resist federal protection of the animals as a threat to livestock. Sportsmen complain that wolves are killing too many big-game animals, such as elk.

But in the decision handed down on Saturday, Molloy said that to reverse his August 2010 decision would be tantamount to sanctioning an illegal action.

Molloy ruled then that the government erred in lifting federal protections for wolves in Idaho and Montana while leaving them intact for wolves in neighboring Wyoming. He agreed with conservationists that the wolves in all three states were part of a single population that could not be treated separately under the Endangered Species Act.

The Fish and Wildlife Service has left Wyoming and its estimated 500 wolves out of its de-listing proposals because that state's management plan would generally have allowed wolves to be shot on sight, as opposed to the licensed-hunting regimens planned by Idaho and Montana.

Despite Molloy's latest ruling, the outcome of wolf protections in the Northern Rockies remained unclear.

Amendments tacked on to budget bills that Congress is expected to vote on next week would accomplish through legislation what the proposed settlement Molloy rejected would have done through the courts, according to a statement posted online by U.S. Sen. John Tester, a Montana Democrat.

If the budget rider is enacted it would be the first time that an animal has been removed from the Endangered Species List by an act of Congress.

In yet another wrinkle, Idaho's Republican governor is considering signing into law a measure that declares the estimated 700 wolves in the state a "disaster emergency." The measure would allow him to marshal state and local law enforcement to kill wolves.

(Editing by Steve Gorman and David Bailey)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
Skyler wrote:
“Idaho’s Republican governor is considering signing into law a measure that declares the estimated 700 wolves in the state a “disaster emergency.” The measure would allow him to marshal state and local law enforcement to kill wolves.”

This governor and his kind need to be shipped to a barren planet in another galaxy to live out their lives. The can take their weapons with them and target practice on each other if they have a need to kill things. These wolves are far more highly evolved than they are.

Apr 09, 2011 12:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
fmills wrote:
It is crazy that the ranchers and farmers of the two geographically huge states of Montana and Idaho can allow the presence of 1200 wolves to make them feel so threatened! 1200 wolves probably eat on the average of 1200 pounds of meat a day. Much of that comes from small game, mice, voles, rabbits, etc. A good percentage comes from deer. But it has been shown that wolf packs take the weak and sickly of the herd of deer. This actually makes the deer herds stronger and healthier. finally if 30 percent of their diet is take from ranchers, that is about 400 pounds of meet a day or one cow every two to three days. Suppose the wolves do take a cow every two days. That would be 183 cows a year. The two states of Montana and Idaho produce 10s of thousands of cows a year. It is a small sacrifice to allow the greatness of our native species to exist in our world.

Apr 10, 2011 1:30am EDT  --  Report as abuse
rchapin38 wrote:
This Judge did the right thing in extending protections for wolves. I have a ranch in NM and do not have any wolves within 250 miles, but I do have mountain lions to be concerned about. I have not had any predation in many years. The wolves are a part of the ecosystem and ranchers must live with that fact whether they like it or not. With regard to the “great white hunter” guy the wolf predation on the elk herds helps the elk to have a stronger presence in the wild country. All of the lame complaining about the wolves and the so called problems they cause is from a bunch of people who need to take a few courses in Biology, ecology and environmental degradation as a result of mans proclivity to kill every wild animal in sight. I wish you people would grow up and learn to live with and enjoy the beautiful wild country of Wyoming, Montana and Idaho.

Apr 10, 2011 1:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.