Japan may re-grade crisis to same level as Chernobyl

TOKYO Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:14pm EDT

1 of 22. Workers in protective suits operate remote-controlled machinery to clear debris in the compound of Tokyo Electric Power (TEPCO) Co.'s crippled Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Fukushima, northern Japan April 10, 2011, in this handout photo released by TEPCO April 11, 2011, one month after the 9.0 magnitude earthquake and a huge tsunami battered Japan's northeast coast.

Credit: Reuters/Tokyo Electric Power Co/Handout

Related Interactive

TOKYO (Reuters) - Japan is considering raising the severity level of its nuclear crisis to put it on a par with the Chernobyl accident 25 years ago, the worst atomic power disaster in history, Kyodo news agency reported on Tuesday.

The report came as the government expanded an evacuation zone around the crippled Fukushima nuclear plant because of the high levels of accumulated radiation since a 15-meter tsunami ripped through the complex a month ago, causing massive damage to its reactors which engineers are still struggling to control.

The Kyodo report said that the high levels of radiation that have been released by the Fukushima Daiichi plant meant it could raise the severity level from 5 to the highest 7, the same as the 1986 Chernobyl accident.

Kyodo said the government's Nuclear Safety Commission had estimated that at one stage the amount of radioactive material released from the reactors in northern Japan had reached 10,000 terabequerels per hour for several hours, which would classify the incident as a major accident according to the INES scale.

The International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale (INES), published by the International Atomic Energy Agency, ranks nuclear incidents by severity from 1 to a maximum of 7.

Kyodo did not say when the big increase in radiation had happened but quoted the commission as saying the release had since fallen to under 1 terabecquerel per hour.

The commission also released a preliminary calculation for the cumulative amount of external exposure to radiation, saying it exceeded the yearly limit of 1 millisieverts in areas extending more than 60 km (36 miles) to the northwest of the plant and about 40 km to the south-southwest.

"It has been obvious all along this was a 7. There are three reactors that are not being cooled (No. 1, 2 and 3) and four fuel pools too (No. 1, 2, 3, and especially 4)," said Arnie Gundersen, a veteran of the nuclear industry who worked on reactors similar to those at Daiichi and who is now chief engineer at Fairewinds Associates Inc of Burlington, Vermont.

He said that meant there were at least seven cores or pools that had been in difficulty. He noted that at Chernobyl it was only one reactor that created the problem.

Japan had previously assessed the accident at reactors operated by Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) at level 5, the same level as the Three Mile Island accident in the United States in 1979.

The tsunami was triggered by March 11 9.0 magnitude earthquake, the largest recorded in quake-prone Japan, crippling the reactors' cooling systems.

A spokesman for the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, Japan's nuclear safety watchdog, said he was unaware of any move by the government to raise the level.

TEPCO said on Monday it had stopped the discharges of low-level radioactive water into the sea that have drawn complaints from neighboring China and South Korea.

It has already pumped 10,400 tones of low-level radioactive water into the ocean to free up storage capacity for highly contaminated water from the reactors.

On Monday, shortly after Japan marked one month since the quake, a huge aftershock shook a wide swathe of eastern Japan, killing two people, and knocking out power to 220,000 homes.

It was one of more than 400 aftershocks above a 5 magnitude to have hit the area since March 11.

Because of accumulated radiation contamination, the government is encouraging people to leave certain areas beyond its 20 km (12 mile) exclusion zone around the plant. Thousands of people could be affected by the move.

TEPCO President Masataka Shimizu visited the area on Monday for the first time since the disaster. He had all but vanished from public view apart from a brief apology shortly after the crisis began and has spent some of the time since in hospital.

"I would like to deeply apologize again for causing physical and psychological hardships to people of Fukushima prefecture and near the nuclear plant," said a grim-faced Shimizu.

Dressed in a blue work jacket, he bowed his head for a moment of silence with other TEPCO officials at 2:46 p.m. (0546 GMT), exactly a calendar month after the earthquake hit.


Engineers at the plant north of Tokyo said they were no closer to restoring the plant's cooling system, which is critical to bring down the temperature of overheated fuel rods and to bringing the six reactors under control.

In a desperate move to cool the highly radioactive fuel rods, TEPCO has pumped water onto reactors, some of which have experienced partial meltdown.

But the strategy has hindered moves to restore the plant's internal cooling system as engineers have had to focus on how to store 60,000 tones of contaminated water.

Engineers are also pumping nitrogen into reactors to counter a build-up of hydrogen and prevent another explosion sending more radiation into the air, but they say the risk of such a dramatic event has lowered significantly since March 11.

The triple disaster is the worst to hit Japan since World War Two, leaving nearly 28,000 dead or missing and rocking the world's third-largest economy.

(Additional reporting by Nathan Layne in Tokyo and Scott DiSavino in New York; Writing by Jonathan Thatcher)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (17)
hilirb wrote:
The Japanese nuclear disaster is one that will never be controlled for the next century. This is because the so called “spent nuclear rods” have a life of 240,000 years. Germany tried storing their spent rods deep in the salt mines. What happened is that the heat from the still alive spent fuel rods melted the salt, the salt corroded the containers, and the leaking fuel contaminated their water supply. That is why Germany is supposed to be out of the nuclear power in about 10 years. All countries should follow their example. Also, nuclear power is the main cause of global warming because the suystem requires the oceans and rivers to cool the reactors. The oceans and rivers are being heated 24 hours a day and the accumulated effect is warmer oceans and rivers due to the 1000 nuclear reactors that are heating the earth’s waters. We will have jacuzzi temperature waters within a not too distant future. With that and the antifreeze that BP and Exxon dumped to control oil spills, the artic and antartic will lose most of the ice if nuclear power is allowed to continue. Nuclear power should have never been allowed but the money hungry lobbyist and electrical generating companies thought it would be a money producing industry even with the pitfalls and dangers. Let our voices be heard to stop Nuclear Power by the end of this year to save the earth. Nuclear power is never safe. There are 3,600,000 pounds of spent nuclear fuel rods at the Japanese plants that are uncontrolled and will generate heat and radiation for 240,000 years. It may already be too late.

Apr 10, 2011 11:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ralphooo wrote:
This is pretty much what anti-nuclear activists have been warning us about for the past 50 years. I never agreed with them — and I still think nuclear power plants can theoretically be designed and operated safely — but finally I am forced to admit that the naysayers have a point. Humans never do things perfectly. In fact, we usually make shockingly bad mistakes.

I see now that even excellent engineering and planning cannot ensure safety until our species stops letting private laziness and greed interfere with serious work. And that day will come… never. It is just not like us to be consistently responsible, day after day, decade after decade.

Nuclear power has little margin for error; humans have little capacity for error-free behavior. Put those elementary facts together and what have you got? One more proof that there are presently too many of us, an excess of human pups, drawing down the resources of a shrinking planet.

Apr 10, 2011 11:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
space_weepul wrote:
hilirb, I think it is important to note that nuclear power does not produce greenhouse gases. Also, coal, oil and natural gas produce heat that is very, very similar to heat produced by nuclear fuel in the production of energy. The steam created by a coal based power plant is just as hot and is cooled in the same fashion as the steam created in a nuclear fuel based power plant.

Unless we are all ready to “return to nature” and allow perhaps a fifth of our fellow humans die, we must continue to use energy. If oil becomes expensive, we will burn coal. Coal burning releases radiation in many cases.

I think we might use more natural gas. I think nuclear power is cool and unavoidable as a power source if we are to continue to live in the manner we currently do without destroying the planet for ourselves.

Apr 11, 2011 1:25am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.