Court rules against Arizona immigration law

PHOENIX Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:41pm EDT

Protesters (L), against SB 1070, yell at police officers outside the Phoenix courthouse in Phoenix, Arizona, July 29, 2010. REUTERS/Rick Scuteri

Protesters (L), against SB 1070, yell at police officers outside the Phoenix courthouse in Phoenix, Arizona, July 29, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Rick Scuteri

Related Topics

PHOENIX (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court, in a ruling released on Monday, upheld a preliminary injunction against parts of Arizona's controversial immigration law that were challenged by the Obama administration.

Arizona's law included a provision that would require the police to determine the immigration status of a person they have detained and suspect is in the country illegally.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a lower court did not abuse its authority by enjoining key sections of the state law, including the police requirement.

The law, which was signed by Republican Governor Jan Brewer at the end of April last year, had wide support in the Mexico border state and across the United States as a whole, but was opposed by President Barack Obama and civil rights groups.

Opponents of the law said it would lead to harassment of Hispanic Americans, and the Obama administration argued the U.S. Constitution gave the federal government sole authority over immigration matters.

The Republican-controlled Arizona legislature passed the measure to try to stem the flood of thousands of illegal immigrants who cross its border from Mexico and to cut down on drug trafficking and other crimes in the area.

U.S. District Court Judge Susan Bolton blocked the law's most controversial elements shortly before it was due to come into effect last July, arguing that immigration matters are the federal government's responsibility.

In addition to the requirement that police check immigration status, Bolton also had blocked a provision requiring immigrants to carry their papers at all times and made it illegal for people without proper documents to solicit for work in public places.

Brewer appealed the decision, arguing that the Obama administration had neglected its responsibility, and that Bolton had abused her discretion in blocking parts of the law, an argument dismissed by the appellate court on Monday.

"We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion" by enjoining two key sections of the law, adding: "Therefore, we affirm the district court's preliminary injunction order enjoining these certain provisions."

Brewer's office did not have any immediate comment.

A Justice Department spokesman said: "We are pleased with the court's decision."

Immigration as an issue has festered in U.S. politics for years and attempts to overhaul the system have failed, most recently in 2007 when Republicans torpedoed reforms pushed by George W. Bush, then the Republican president.

The case in the 9th Circuit is United States of America v. State of Arizona, 10-16645.

(Reporting by Dan Levine; Additional reporting by Tim Gaynor; Editing by Eric Beech)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
elangdon1955 wrote:
It was obvious that the liberal loons on the 9th Circuit would rule this way. Next the Supreme Court.

Apr 11, 2011 1:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
DPender wrote:
No doubt another liberal court.

Apr 11, 2011 2:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
USAPragmatist wrote:
Go figure, anyone who knows anything saw this coming, this law will never survive a Constitutional challenge.

Apr 11, 2011 2:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.