Bank regulators in pact with mortgage lenders

WASHINGTON/CHARLOTTE, North Carolina Wed Apr 13, 2011 6:00pm EDT

Police tape marked as a Foreclosure Free Zone is seen outside the foreclosed home of Marie Elie in Elmont, New York, April 9, 2009. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

Police tape marked as a Foreclosure Free Zone is seen outside the foreclosed home of Marie Elie in Elmont, New York, April 9, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

WASHINGTON/CHARLOTTE, North Carolina (Reuters) - Major housing lenders agreed to costly fixes to their foreclosure practices as part of a settlement with U.S. bank regulators that jumped ahead of a states' probe.

Banks agreed to compensate borrowers who were wrongly foreclosed upon, to overhaul their mortgage operations, and undergo an independent review of their 2009 and 2010 foreclosures, with money penalties still to be decided.

JPMorgan Chase said on Wednesday the bank expects $1.1 billion of costs linked to the orders, as it hires 2,000 to 3,000 people to comply with the settlement.

The 14 financial institutions and service providers who settled with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve and the Office of Thrift Supervision, also included Bank of America Corp, Wells Fargo & Co, and Citigroup Inc.

The bank regulators said the servicers still face financial penalties. "We're not letting that clock run forever, there will be civil money penalties," acting OCC head John Walsh told reporters.

The settlement announced on Wednesday leaves in doubt the total costs facing the industry. It also fails to resolve legal uncertainty that has stalled foreclosures, keeping the recovery of the broader housing market in limbo.

State and other federal agencies probing mortgage problems had previously hoped to announce simultaneous settlements and sought on Wednesday to portray the deal as a first step to fixing the broken foreclosure system.

Justice Department and Department of Housing and Urban Development officials told reporters they were negotiating with lenders on what should be included in reform plans due in 60 days under the settlement with banking regulators.

STATES TO PRESS ON

Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, leader of the states' investigation, said the bank regulators' actions would not affect their pursuit of a joint settlement.

U.S. foreclosures are expected to peak in 2011 at around 1.2 million, California-based RealtyTrac said earlier this year. In 2005, before the housing bust, banks took back about 100,000 houses.

One banking analyst said the settlement would be costly to banks and would-be home buyers, while failing to keep people in homes they cannot afford.

"The banks are not going to do this for free. This is going to lead to higher loan costs," said Matt McCormick, portfolio manager at Bahl & Gaynor Investment Counsel Inc.

Federal regulators and state attorneys general have been investigating bank mortgage practices that came to light last year, including the use of "robo-signers" to sign hundreds of unread foreclosure documents a day.

Some state attorneys general, along with some parts of the Obama administration, had been pushing for principal reduction on troubled mortgages and fines of about $20 billion.

"The enforcement orders issued today are important, but they are only a first step in setting out a framework for these large institutions to remedy these deficiencies and to identify homeowners harmed as a result of servicer errors," said the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

OCC's Walsh said it is still possible the bank regulators will coordinate penalties on lenders with actions taken by the states and other federal agencies.

Consumer groups and some lawmakers were critical of the settlement, arguing the banking regulators proposal is too weak and that they should never have let the servicing problems erupt in the first place.

"This is typical of the bank regulators, showing up to put out the fire after the place has burned down," said John Taylor, chief executive of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition.

PROBLEMS FOUND

The bank regulators said they found a series of problems including servicers filing affidavits in court where an employee vouched for personally knowing the details to be true when they did not.

The banks neither admitted nor denied the findings.

Under the agreement, servicers would have to hire an outside consultant to review foreclosure actions that took place between January 2009 and December 2010.

Lenders would have to provide a single point of contact for borrowers involved in a foreclosure or loan modification program so they have a direct line to the servicer.

Servicers would also be prohibited from so-called "dual tracking," the practice of starting a foreclosure while a loan modification is pending.

Adam Levitin, a Georgetown University law professor who has been critical of the mortgage industry and its record-keeping, was skeptical of the outside reviews of foreclosures.

"The banks will only choose third parties friendly to them," he told Reuters. "Bottom line is this is a slap on the wrist. Do it yourself compliance is what this is about."

The other lenders and loan servicers who signed agreements with their regulators were: HSBC bank, MetLife Bank Bank, Ally Financial, PNC bank, SunTrust, US Bancorp, Aurora Bank, EverBank, OneWest Bank and Sovereign Bank.

Lender Processing Services Inc, which helps banks manage mortgage foreclosure documentation, also reached a settlement with the bank regulators, as did the Mortgage Electronic Registration Service, known as MERS, a company established by the big loan servicers to track mortgage ownership and whose legal standing has been questioned by some courts in foreclosure cases.

(Reporting by Dave Clarke in Washington, Clare Baldwin in New York and Joe Rauch in Charlotte; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn and Tim Dobbyn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
jimfin wrote:
A main issue for owners, buyers, lenders and the U.S. housing market is whether clear chain-of-title now exists with millions of homes across the country.

If the stocks of the title insurers have not already declined substantially, then the rooster cannot be any more in control of the hen house than in this consent decree.

Further, apart from the pesky rule-of-law, that old fashioned right of due-process and that little thing called the Constitution, according to this and other reports:

1. Consultants hired and paid by banks (and not wronged homeowners/borrowers/citizens) determine whether mistakes made by servicers or their vendors caused someone to lose their home or a refinancing.

Wait a minute. The banks are the servicers. They’re going to hire someone to figure out if they acted wrongly and then find themselves guilty?

They already declined to admit guilt in the consent decree. This is in the face of evidence confirmed by reports to already exist having been submitted to courts in the form of the alleged fraudulent affidavits and foreclosure documents.

2. Banks themselves (and not the homeowners/borrowers) determine the financial injury to the borrower and then submit a “plan”.

Wait a minute. The banks and their consultants who find them guilty (if you can believe this will ever happen) are going to be the ones who decide how much that guilt is worth?

Usually the government does not transfer the right of remedy and assessment of damages to the party who performed the wrongful act.

Soon armed robbers will be able to tell their victims the value of that which they stole after they find themselves not so much guilty of breaking in through that window, but “administratively impaired in teh course of transit”.

3. Not one bank, nor MERS, nor LPS, nor any loan officer nor any lawyer as referenced in reports and alleged in various articles to have conducted wrongdoings is subject to prosecution or sanction or penalty by the governmental agencies whose job it is to…. – regulate -????????

Welcome to the absolute new America. It started about three years ago. No one held responsible.

Talk about a strutting Rooster!

Apr 13, 2011 2:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Mema2007 wrote:
You all need to watch the documentary “INSIDE JOB” see who caused the market failure. It is very informative. Available at Amazon and Netflix.

BofA has not forclosured on me and it has been 3 years. Never a letter indicating they were even thinking about it. I put my home up for sale in November 2007 and then requested a Short Sale approval in March of 2008. Got an approval, signed escrow papers and ………., still waiting. Been through 7 or 8 offers since and they have done nothing to complete one of them but drag their feet. Everybody at BoA should have new shoes by now. There has been no signs of inteligent life there.

Apr 13, 2011 6:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.