Italy votes on justice bill cutting Berlusconi trial

Related Topics

ROME | Wed Apr 13, 2011 5:42am EDT

ROME (Reuters) - Italy's parliament is due to vote on a justice reform bill on Wednesday which would cut the length of many trials and end a bribery case against Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi.

If approved, the provision would shorten the statute of limitations and would kill the case in which Berlusconi is accused of paying British lawyer David Mills a $600,000 bribe to give false testimony about his business dealings.

It forms part of a broader program launched by Justice Minister Angelino Alfano, presented by the government as reform of Italy's dysfunctional justice system but viewed by critics as a plan to keep Berlusconi out of jail.

Opponents have protested outside parliament for several days and the debate inside the building has often been heated.

Center-left parties have used filibustering tactics against the bill which they say flouts the constitutional principle that everyone is equal before the law.

The debate will continue in the lower house on Wednesday, with a vote due in the evening.

"We want to reiterate that it's not just laws but also the principles of the constitution that the government is trampling on," said Dario Franceschini, lower house leader of the largest opposition party, the Democrats of the Left.

Berlusconi's bribery case is due to run until January or February 2012, but if the bill is approved it would shorten that by about 8 months, ending the trial by the summer before a sentence has been handed down.

Alfano, a 40-year-old Sicilian often cast as Berlusconi's political heir, has denied that his reform of Italy's notoriously snail-paced justice system is aimed at getting Berlusconi off the hook.

But the timing of the legislation coincides with the launch of several cases against the prime minister, including a trial in which he is accused of paying for sex with "Ruby," an under-age Moroccan dancer.

The trials were previously suspended by a measure passed by his government which allowed him to claim that his official duties meant he did not have enough time to prepare his defense and could therefore claim immunity from trial while in office.

The constitutional court ruled against that measure in January, prompting magistrates to re-open fraud and bribery trials and bring the prostitution case to court.

On Monday, Berlusconi launched a bitter attack against the magistrates as he emerged from a hearing in a tax fraud trial, saying he was the victim of an attempt by leftist enemies to eliminate him from the political scene.

If the bill is approved in the lower house, where Berlusconi has a slim majority, it will go to the Senate for a final vote.

(Writing by Catherine Hornby; Editing by Janet Lawrence)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
SeniorMoment wrote:
I am puzzled by this move, which suggests much broader corruption in Italy’s political system. However, in the USA I do not believe such a law would apply retroactively in a case already indicted such as Berlusconi’s since he was charged and allegedly committed thea crime before passage of the law. Why is that not true in Italy.

Also I do not believe there is a common statute of limitations for crimes involving perjury, fraud, treason or murder. Also I believe in the USA the clock on statutes of limitation stops indefinitely once a charge has been filed against an alleged criminal, even if the criminal cannot actually be found and brought to trial. A person can be convicted I believe as well in absentia if the evidence is strong enough and the indicted person does not show up for the trial date.

It is very unlikely the US will though get involved in Italian internal affairs as Berlusconi has done most if not all of what U. S. foreign policy has asked short of providing Italian troops. I haven’t read if Italy has let its Air Force participate in the No-Fly-Zone enforcement over Libya, but it has made base in Italy available for use in the operation.
I even suspect that Berlusconi could be charged in the USA if any of the loss or bribe involved money from the USA given for any purpose.

The public should demand

Apr 13, 2011 7:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.