Western, Arab nations say Gaddafi must go

1 of 18. Protesters rally against Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in Benghazi April 13, 2011. The sign reads: ''El Zintan is in our hearts''.

Credit: Reuters/Amr Abdallah Dalsh

DOHA/TRIPOLI | Wed Apr 13, 2011 7:10pm EDT

DOHA/TRIPOLI (Reuters) - A group of Western powers and Middle Eastern states called for the first time on Wednesday for Muammar Gaddafi to step aside, but NATO countries squabbled publicly over stepping up air strikes to help topple him.

In a victory for Britain and France, which are leading the air campaign in Libya and pushed for an unequivocal call for regime change, the "contact group" of European and Middle Eastern nations, plus the United Nations, the Arab League and the African Union, said Gaddafi must go.

"Gaddafi and his regime has lost all legitimacy and he must leave power allowing the Libyan people to determine their future," a final statement obtained by Reuters said.

It also said the rebels' national council, "in contrast with the current regime ... is a legitimate interlocutor, representing the aspirations of the Libyan people."

The wording was much tougher than at a conference two weeks ago and gave stronger backing to insurgents fighting to end Gaddafi's 41-year rule. Participants would work on a financial mechanism to help rebels run the eastern region they control.

The group also agreed to provide "material support" for the rebels. Although the statement did not give details, diplomats said some nations might interpret this as supplying arms -- a key request of the outgunned insurgents.

Material support could include "all the other needs, including defense equipment," said Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani of Qatar, a leading Arab supporter of the month-old revolt inspired by uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt.

A French presidential source said Paris had no plans to arm the rebels, although it would not oppose other countries if they decide to do so. President Nicolas Sarkozy discussed Libya with visiting British Prime Minister David Cameron.

Britain said on Wednesday it would supply 1,000 sets of body armor from surplus British defense supplies to Libyan rebels, on top of the 100 satellite phones already sent.

The rebels said they were in talks with "friendly" countries to obtain arms: "I don't think there will be a problem getting weapons," national council spokesman Abdel Hafiz Ghoga told reporters in the rebel stronghold of Benghazi.

FIGHTING

At Ajdabiyah on the eastern front, rebels said they were exchanging rocket fire with Gaddafi's forces from a point about 40 km (25 miles) east of the government-held oil port of Brega.

Rebels reported more heavy fighting in Misrata, their main bastion in western Libya, and said they were making progress against forces besieging the city, pushing them back 10 km in one area. It was not possible to verify the claim.

A rebel sympathizer in Misrata named Ghassan said rebels had pushed back government forces on its central Tripoli Street.

"After they withdrew they fired artillery at the Al-Bira neighborhood, which lies in the center near Tripoli Street," he said. "We haven't been able to reach the hospital to check whether there were any people killed or injured."

A rebel spokesman called Abdelrahman told Reuters fighters had attacked pro-Gaddafi forces on a hill west of Zintan, the rebels' other redoubt in the west.

"The main problem in Zintan is fuel shortages. There are also water shortages and electricity is not always available."

Libyan television said NATO planes had bombed Misrata and Gaddafi's birthplace of Sirte. A NATO official said there were no strikes in either city, but the alliance had hit anti-aircraft weapons about 24 km south of Misrata.

The World Food Programme said Libya was facing a humanitarian crisis and United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told the Doha meeting that up to 3.6 million people, or more than half the population, could need assistance.

Libya's Planning and Finance Minister Abdulhafid Zlitni told a news conference in Tripoli $120 billion of Libyan assets had been frozen by foreign banks under sanctions, but the country still had reserves in gold and other assets. There were "no legal grounds" for diverting Libyan assets to rebels, he said.

DIVISIONS

While there was agreement in Doha on the principle of removing Gaddafi, there were divisions over how to proceed.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague called for more alliance members to join attacks on ground targets and his French counterpart, Alain Juppe, called for heavier military pressure on Gaddafi's troops to convince him to leave power.

But Belgian Foreign Minister Steven Vanackere said the March 17 U.N. resolution authorizing NATO action in Libya -- to protect civilians from Gaddafi's government forces -- ruled out arming civilians and he saw no need to boost air power there.

Britain and France, western Europe's two main military powers, are delivering most of the air strikes on Gaddafi's armor. There is increasing frustration in Paris and London that air strikes have neither tipped the balance of the war in favor of the rebels nor ended devastating shelling of Misrata.

NATO's high-flying aircraft are running out of targets they can hit without endangering civilians, experts say. Some argue that the United States could tip the balance with weapons like the A-10 "tankbuster" plane and helicopter gunships, but Washington is reluctant to be drawn more deeply into the war.

Juppe called for better coordination with rebel forces on the ground in choosing targets. On Tuesday Juppe said NATO had not done enough to stop Gaddafi bombarding Misrata, where hundreds of civilians are reported to have died in a long siege.

His remarks seemed to be at least partly aimed at the United States after President Barack Obama ordered his forces to take a back seat in the Libya campaign.

French Defense Minister Gerard Longuet told parliament in Paris on Tuesday that without U.S. ground attack aircraft joining in the strikes, NATO would not be able to loosen Gaddafi's noose around towns like Misrata and Zintan.

Rebels attending the Doha meeting said they expected more support, saying NATO was using "minimum" power and needed to step up attacks on Gaddafi's heavy weapons. The rebels said they would ask for $1.5 billion in aid for civilians.

(Additional reporting by Mussab al-Khairalla in Tripoli; John Irish, Humeyra Pamuk and Regan Doherty in Doha; Michael Georgy in Ajdabiyah; Alexander Dziadosz in Benghazi; Souhail Karam and Richard Lough in Rabat; Yann Le Guernigou in Paris; David Brunnstrom in Brussels and Christian Lowe in Algiers; Writing by Barry Moody and Peter Graff)

(This story was corrected to say that Gaddafi's Deputy Foreign Minister Khaled Kaim said 20 Qatari trainers had been deployed in Benghazi instead of 2,000 Qatari trainers).

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
Tellthetruth wrote:
Over Iraqi the media convinced us that Saddam had WMD. 8 years later we now have 4.5 million orphans 70% of which resulted as a result of invasion and more than 1 million widows in Iraqi.
The US and the whole of Nato supported this horrific crime against humanity.
Am I expected to believe that these select countries are truly wanting to protect civilian lives in Lybia!
If these countries are truly genuine about protecting civilians they should start reconstrcuting a country that they completely destroyed.

“We are protecting civilians” must be the most hyprocritical slogan that has come out of this Lybian crisis.
These countries just want to destroy the Libya defence systems so that they can sell more arms again.

Apr 13, 2011 3:39am EDT  --  Report as abuse
SeniorMoment wrote:
NATO is a paper tiger because it depends on the expicit cooperation of all member nations, and I know of no conflict, including what is going in Libya where all NATO member nations have fully participated, such as contributing to combat or air operations in proportion to the nation’s economic size. I bet the Germans have not contributed a single plane even to the no-fly-zone over Libya.

Apr 13, 2011 6:15am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Asaki wrote:
I think that or even sure the rebels have bitten more than they could chew since they started the uprising oust Gaddai and his clique.The international community have done their best to destroy Colonel Gaddafi’s heavy weapons.But,still,there a lot to be done again for the rebels,who I suppose,must have the courage to fight not only relying on bombardment by NATO.Whenever there is politics in a crisis such as the one facing the libyan people progress will simply not come soon.However,the international communuity must speak with one voice in order to prevent another bloodbath.

Apr 13, 2011 7:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.