Factbox: Impact on wildlife from the BP oil spill

Related Topics

A pelican coated in oil stands on the beach during stormy weather in Ship Island, Mississippi, July 1, 2010. REUTERS/Ben Gruber

A pelican coated in oil stands on the beach during stormy weather in Ship Island, Mississippi, July 1, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Ben Gruber

Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:53am EDT

(Reuters) - BP Plc's 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico affected bird populations, sea turtles, fish, shellfish and some dolphin.

Below is a compilation of visibly oiled or dead animals in the Gulf of Mexico and along the coast collected by state and federal workers and contractors for the oil company.

Not all of the reported deaths were thought to be caused by the oil spill, and the data was last published November 2, 2010.

Visibily oiled:

Birds: 2,263

Sea Turtles: 18

Mammals: 4

Reptiles: 0

Total: 2,285

Dead:

Birds: 6,104

Sea Turtles: 609

Mammals: 100

Reptiles: 1

Total: 6,814

Source: Data compiled by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

(Reporting by Anna Driver in Houston; Editing by Philip Barbara)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
lvanlaer wrote:
Every year, the fishing industry causes far more damage to gulf wildlife than oil spills. Why isn’t anyone outraged over that?
From the sea turtle conservancy web site:
“Each year thousands of immature and adult sea turtles are inadvertently captured, injured or killed by U.S. fishermen in the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico as they feed in or move through areas where fishermen work.”

Apr 15, 2011 9:16am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.