Republican judge nears Wisconsin election win

Related Topics

MADISON, Wis | Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:32pm EDT

MADISON, Wis (Reuters) - The Republican incumbent in Wisconsin's closely watched Supreme Court race was one step closer to being officially declared the winner on Friday after officials finished their review of the closely-watched vote.

Statewide results for the election, which came to be seen as a referendum on Republican efforts to curb public sector unions, will not be certified before next Wednesday, when the deadline passes for the candidates to request a recount.

But with all 72 of the state's counties reporting, the incumbent, former Republican state assemblyman David Prosser, appears to have beat the challenger, JoAnne Kloppenburg, by 7,316 votes -- a margin of 0.488 percent of the almost 1.5 million votes cast.

That means Kloppenburg, an assistant state attorney specializing in environmental issues, can demand a free recount, under Wisconsin law. Her campaign did not immediately indicate on Friday whether it would do so.

Kevin Kennedy, the head of the Government Accountability Board, which oversees elections in the state, said in statement his agency would certify the results, which took 10 days to compile, "when we know whether a recount is requested. That decision is now in the hands of the candidates."

Races for the high court are normally low-profile affairs. But this year, the contest took on added significance because it was the first statewide race since the Republican-controlled legislature approved a proposal by Governor Scott Walker to restrict public workers union rights.

Several legal challenges to the law are also making their way toward the state's top court -- giving the race's outcome additional importance.

Prosser's apparent victory means the high court's current 4-3 conservative majority will stand, something that opponents of the anti-union measure regard with concern.

Walker and the Republicans who backed the curbs on collective bargaining by public workers said they were needed to help close budget gaps across the state.

Critics saw the bill, which eliminates automatic deduction of union dues, as a Republican attack on the single biggest source of funding for the Democratic Party -- unions.

The deeply partisan fight was part of a broader national confrontation between the Republicans and unions that could be the biggest since then President Ronald Reagan fired striking air traffic controllers nearly 30 years ago. Lawmakers in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and several other states pushed anti-union measures of their own.

The stakes are high for labor because more than a third of U.S. public employees such as teachers, police and civil service workers belong to unions while only 6.9 percent of private sector workers are unionized. In Wisconsin, 46.6 percent of government workers are union members

(Reporting by James B. Kelleher and Jeff Mayers; Editing by Greg McCune)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
berational wrote:
Recount and get to the bottom of those suspicious “found” votes!

Apr 15, 2011 5:44pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
crbob wrote:
Of course with plenty of illegal union money she definitely will ask for a recount to delay it as long as possible…..goodbye unions….good riddance….

Apr 15, 2011 6:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Donsays wrote:
If you take a look at the voting from the November 2010 election you will see that the results from this election follow the demographic for the county in question. There is nothing suspicious about the count. But reflect on why the strong-arm of the unions outside leadership went to such length to demonize a democratically elected Governor who was looking out for the fiscal integrity of his state. The state employees really are not losing what they had. They are taking responsibility for themselves.

Apr 15, 2011 7:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.