Q+A-Japan's nuclear owner aims for shutdown of reactors

TOKYO, April 18 Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:59am EDT

TOKYO, April 18 (Reuters) - Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO), the operator of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant at the centre of Japan's crisis, said on Sunday it hopes to achieve a "cold shutdown" of its crippled plant within six to nine months.

The following summarises what TEPCO aims for and some of the challenges facing the operator as Japanese engineers scramble to deal with the worst nuclear crisis since the 1986 Chernobyl meltdown.

WHAT IS A COLD SHUTDOWN?

A cold shutdown is a state in which the water cooling the fuel rods is below 100 degrees Celsius and the reactors are considered stable. It means that the water used to cool the fuel rods is below boiling point.

Of the Daiichi plant's six reactors hit by the earthquake and tsunami, two are seen as safe, but the other four remain volatile.

Workers succeeded in halting the reactors after the quake hit, but they were unable to cool them in time before some of the fuel melted inside the reactor cores after the water cooling them evaporated.

WHY IS TEPCO'S ANNOUNCEMENT SIGNIFICANT?

This is the first time TEPCO announced a timetable for its operations since the disaster that struck more than five weeks ago.

Within the first three months, the operator said, it plans to cool the reactors and the spent fuel stored in some of them to a stable level and reduce the leakage of radiation. [ID:nL3E7FH03J]

TEPCO then hopes to bring the reactors to a cold shutdown in another three to six months.

HOW DOES TEPCO INTEND TO ACHIEVE A COLD SHUTDOWN?

The operator said it wants to fill the reactors with enough water so the fuel rods can be cooled for a cold shutdown.

TEPCO has been pouring water into the reactor vessels, which contain the nuclear fuel rods, since the disaster to cool the rods as an emergency measure.

In a step forward from this emergency measure, TEPCO wants to achieve a cold shutdown by filling the containment vessel, an outer shell of steel and concrete that houses the reactor vessel, with water in a step known as water entombment.

At the same time it will work to restore the reactors' cooling system, which functions like a radiator on an automobile. TEPCO said mounting a separate cooling system externally was also a possibility.

For reactors like the No.2 reactor with suspected damage to the containment vessel, TEPCO said it hopes to seal damaged sections with a type of cement to prevent water being pumped in from leaking out.

WHAT ARE THE CHALLENGES FACING TEPCO?

The aim to fill the reactors with enough water sounds simple but engineers have had to battle with a damaged cooling system since the earthquake.

Until the cooling systems are fixed or other alternatives are online to continually cool the reactors, workers will be forced to keep injecting new water to cool the fuel and create a steady flow of contaminated water.

Within its self-imposed time frame TEPCO said it will build storage tanks to store the contaminated water and attempt to treat some of it. It also aims to cover the reactors with large covers to prevent the spread of radioactive material into the atmosphere.

TEPCO said constant aftershocks, power outages, high levels of radiation and the threat of hydrogen explosions were also factors that could hamper its work.

Weather conditions, such as the approaching rainy season and typhoons and lightning during the summer, could also pose problems.

WHAT ARE OFFICIALS SAYING?

Banri Kaieda, Japan's trade minister, told reporters on Sunday: "The first juncture towards safety would be when the fuel rods are fully submerged in water and a cold shutdown is achieved.

"But true safety will not come until the fuel rods are removed from the reactors," he said, adding that he would like to assess in six to nine months whether residents evacuated from near the Daiichi plant can return home.

Hidehiko Nishiyama, a deputy director-general at Japan's nuclear safety agency, said: "Unlike a normal shutdown when large quantities of sea water can be used to cool down a reactor, the options are limited, so it may take a significant amount of time until a cold shutdown is reached." (Reporting by Shinichi Saoshiro; Editing by Chris Gallagher)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
caminito wrote:
Unfortunately, all the program of TEPCO is a wish list. which main
drawback is that it does not address the problem how to make repairs, especially regarding the cooling system (old or new) within the inaccessible high radiation zone witin the containment vessel. Particularly. even if a circulation system could be restaured, how to seal the leaks with cement(which are mainly on the bottom of the vessel and the reactor itself and therefore always under water), under the prohibitiv radiation, but avaiding that this same cement deposits on the rods, isolating them (at least partially) thermically and provoking all kinds of chemical reactions.

Again: all this is only a WISH LIST and TEPCO, in some of its releases, candidly stated that they would not have released it if Mr. KAN has not “ordered” so to alliviate the public pressure for s time table.

In my opinion, the probabilities of SUCCESS of such actions is VERY LOW, in the meantime, DURING MANY MONTHS further water will be pumped in and leaking out, making further releases to the sea unavoidable. And if the result finally is negative, the situation WOULD REVERT TO POINT ZERO!

Therefore, even if this would be very costly, preparatives for a “HOT BURIAL” should be initiated immediately, and if the Governement / TEPCO
thinks that their program has real chances, to try it parallely to to said preparatives

Apr 18, 2011 9:25am EDT  --  Report as abuse
caminito wrote:
Unfortunately, all the program of TEPCO is a wish list. which main
drawback is that it does not address the problem how to make repairs, especially regarding the cooling system (old or new) within the inaccessible high radiation zone witin the containment vessel. Particularly. even if a circulation system could be restaured, how to seal the leaks with cement(which are mainly on the bottom of the vessel and the reactor itself and therefore always under water), under the prohibitiv radiation, but avaiding that this same cement deposits on the rods, isolating them (at least partially) thermically and provoking all kinds of chemical reactions.

Again: all this is only a WISH LIST and TEPCO, in some of its releases, candidly stated that they would not have released it if Mr. KAN has not “ordered” so to alliviate the public pressure for s time table.

In my opinion, the probabilities of SUCCESS of such actions is VERY LOW, in the meantime, DURING MANY MONTHS further water will be pumped in and leaking out, making further releases to the sea unavoidable. And if the result finally is negative, the situation WOULD REVERT TO POINT ZERO!

Therefore, even if this would be very costly, preparatives for a “HOT BURIAL” should be initiated immediately, and if the Governement / TEPCO
thinks that their program has real chances, to try it parallely to to said preparatives

Apr 18, 2011 9:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.