Read
- Kanye West wins over critics with 'daring' new album 'Yeezus'
- Angelina Jolie stunt double sues News Corp over hacking
- Massachusetts police search NFL player's home in homicide probe: report
- Journalist who brought down U.S. general is killed in Los Angeles car crash
- Shares edge up, dollar steady as markets await Fed
Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
The Afghan Army
The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO. Slideshow
Sponsored Links
West wants military, aid action to end Libya crisis
1 of 22. Libyan civilians being evacuated by a fishing boat from Misrata wait to disembark at the port of Benghazi April 18, 2011. Fishing boats frequently sail from Benghazi into the port of Misrata to help evacuate trapped civilians.
Credit: Reuters/Yannis Behrakis
BENGHAZI, Libya |
BENGHAZI, Libya (Reuters) - NATO may have to intensify attacks on government forces to break the military stalemate in Libya, while the United Nations pushes for a humanitarian presence to help civilians trapped in the conflict.
Both approaches, aimed at carrying out a U.N. Security Council mandate to protect Libyan civilians from attack by President Muammar Gaddafi's troops, will focus on the western city of Misrata, the only west Libyan city still in rebel hands.
Hundreds of people are thought to have been killed in the seven-week siege of the port city, where thousands of foreign migrant workers are stranded. A rebel spokesman said at least 31 people were killed in Misrata on Sunday and Monday by government shellfire and snipers.
Two months after the Libyan rebellion broke out in earnest, inspired by uprisings against autocratic rulers elsewhere in the Arab world, the insurgents control only the east of the country from their Benghazi stronghold, and part of Misrata.
NATO bombing has damaged Gaddafi's armor but not enough to break the stalemate, and the alliance may have no choice but to use naval gunfire or helicopters, analysts said -- the latter vulnerable to ground fire by Gaddafi's troops.
"There's more risks using helicopters as they are easier to shoot down, and it's a serious problem if you have casualties or people captured," said Daniel Keohane of the EU Institute for Security Studies think tank.
BOXED IN
The U.S., British and French leaders said last week they would not stop military action until Gaddafi quit.
"They've boxed themselves in by describing victory as Gaddafi leaving," said Keohane. "I don't think there's any way they can walk away now. There's a political imperative to carry on."
While NATO looked for a more effective way of attacking Gaddafi's forces despite limited resources, UN humanitarian chief Valerie Amos said on Monday in Benghazi she was extremely worried about the plight of civilians in Misrata.
"I very much hope the security situation will allow us to get into Misrata," she said. "No one has any sense of the depth and scale of what is happening there.
Before the rebellion, Misrata had a population of 300,000.
The European Union outlined a tentative plan on Monday to send European troops to Misrata to protect aid deliveries if requested by the United Nations, EU officials said.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, in Budapest, said Gaddafi's government had agreed to a humanitarian presence in the capital Tripoli. His spokesman Farhan Haq said this included an agreement on the entry of international humanitarian staff and equipment through the Tunisian border.
Details were scarce, and so far Libya has not agreed to a ceasefire to allow aid providers an opportunity to work.
Previously, NATO leaders had ruled out sending ground troops into Libya, but EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said on Monday "The 27 (EU members) have now adopted unanimously the concept of the operations" -- if the UN requested it.
Any EU mission could involve hundreds of military personnel securing transport of supplies directly to Libya, in particular Misrata, and helping to supply food and shelter to refugee camps on the Tunisian and Egyptian borders.
EU troops would not have a combat role, except to protect the humanitarian mission, but analysts say the arrival of the first Western troops since the Libyan crisis erupted would be significant.
A chartered ship evacuated nearly 1,000 foreign workers and wounded Libyans from Misrata on Monday, the second evacuation ship in the past few days. Rebels said they had gained ground in fighting in the Tripoli Street area despite government shelling.
"It is clear Gaddafi wants to wipe out Misrata. NATO's inaction is helping him carry out this plan. Are they waiting for a massacre to happen to realize that they need to change tactics?" rebel spokesman Abdelsalam told Reuters by telephone.
The Libyan government denies allegations that it is violating its people's human rights and says it is fighting gangs of al Qaeda militants.
Pro-Gaddafi forces have also kept up an offensive on the rebels' eastern frontline outpost of Ajdabiyah, from where the rebels hope to retake the oil port of Brega, 80 km to the west.
(Additional reporting by Ashraf Fahim in Benghazi, Mussab Al-Khairalla in Tripoli, Mariam Karoumy in Beirut, Sami Aboudi in Cairo, Hamid Ould Ahmed in Algiers, Joseph Nasr in Berlin; Writing by Tim Pearce; Editing by Peter Graff)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
It was never realistic for civilians alone to beat an organized military, even if the Gadhafi military is so inferior to Western standards that it could easily fall to NATO forces.
Libya better hope that Donald Trump does not get nominated and elected President since he has already come out in favor of U. S. colonialism. He would seize Libya and merely allocate a portion of its oil revenues for the benefit of the Libyan people. Like it or not that is within the practical power of a U. S. President, although it is not a way to gain allies and economical resources.
No President who has started a war has been stopped by Congress. The Iraq War is a perfect example of one that should have been stopped. In my opinion President G W. Bush invaded Iraq soley because President G. H. W. Bush failed to get a complete resolution of the hazard posed by former ally Saddam Hussein, and for no other reason. I told my family the U. S. would be invading Iraq when President G. W. Bush was elected and I had no doubts whatsoever about that.
Once a war is started the President corners Congress for funding in the name of protecting the troops already there. The U. S. Constitution needs to be updated on war issues. The days of kings are past.
It was never realistic for civilians alone to beat an organized military, even if the Gadhafi military is so inferior to Western standards that it could easily fall to NATO forces.
Libya better hope that Donald Trump does not get nominated and elected President since he has already come out in favor of U. S. colonialism. He would seize Libya and merely allocate a portion of its oil revenues for the benefit of the Libyan people. Like it or not that is within the practical power of a U. S. President, although it is not a way to gain allies and economical resources.
No President who has started a war has been stopped by Congress. The Iraq War is a perfect example of one that should have been stopped. In my opinion President G W. Bush invaded Iraq soley because President G. H. W. Bush failed to get a complete resolution of the hazard posed by former ally Saddam Hussein, and for no other reason. I told my family the U. S. would be invading Iraq when President G. W. Bush was elected and I had no doubts whatsoever about that.
Once a war is started the President corners Congress for funding in the name of protecting the troops already there. The U. S. Constitution needs to be updated on war issues. The days of kings are past.







Follow Reuters