Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Tornado chasers

Storm chasers brave danger and debris as they try to capture photos of tornadoes' destructive power.  Slideshow 

Photo

Running while blind

Blind or visually impaired students compete in blind track and field tournament.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Match.com to screen dating site for sex offenders

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:56pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Match.com said it will begin checking users against the national sex offender registry, days after a class action lawsuit was filed by a woman allegedly sexually assaulted by a man she met on the dating site.

The decision came after years of considering the move but deciding against it because of the unreliability of the screening method, Match.com President Mandy Ginsberg said in a statement released late Sunday.

"Improved technology and an improved database now enables a sufficient degree of accuracy to move forward with this initiative, despite its continued imperfection," she said.

Match.com, based in Dallas and owned by New York-based media holding company IAC/Interactivecorp, said it expects to implement the screening in 60 to 90 days.

The announcement came after a Hollywood executive, identified only as Jane Doe, called for the site to change its policies in a lawsuit filed last week in Los Angeles County Superior Court. In the suit, the woman alleges she was sexually assaulted by another Match.com member, Alan Paul Wurtzel, who had been convicted six times for sexual battery, according to a statement issued by her attorney, Mark Webb.

According to the class action lawsuit, the woman met Wurtzel through Match.com in 2010, and the two set up a meeting, after which he raped her. Related felony charges are pending, according to court documents.

Among other things, the civil suit seeks an injunction prohibiting Match.com from signing up further members until the screening of members is implemented.

Webb did not immediately respond to a phone message seeking further comment.

Match.com spokesman Matthew Traub said the company had already been considering a plan to screen users against the sex offender registry when the lawsuit was filed, though the attention brought by the suit expedited the decision.

(Reporting by Daniel Lovering; Editing by Jackie Frank)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Match.com may be the first to do something to protect against harm, (far to late in my opinion) but it is not enough – after the fact – and action must be implemented industry-wide. Simply looking at the Sex Offender database is not going to help protect people. We must go further by looking at free public court record databases to find “patterns for concern” and ban these members. There should also be a for-public-use, yet private, Dating Industry database that records and tracks Banned memberships to expedite the process for all concerned whereby keeping the cost of investigation and protection cost effective and timely.

As a singles advocate over seeing several singles groups, I discourage use of dating sites for reasons well beyond the context of this lawsuit. However, I do advocate singles groups where people meet face to face and in safe interest focused group settings. But this too has its inherent risks. When there is cause for concern, I check public records and talk to friends of said person to qualify whether action is required. On two occasions, in five years, potential harm was avoided by protecting our interests and integrity as a whole.

In leadership, whether an individual or within the confines of a corparate unbrella, it is [our] resposibility to protect those we serve.

Apr 19, 2011 7:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.