Wealth and Investing Center

Supreme Court takes no action on Obama healthcare case

U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks during the launch of ''Joining Forces'', a national initiative in support of service members and their families, in the East Room at the White House in Washington, April 12, 2011. REUTERS/Jim Young

U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks during the launch of ''Joining Forces'', a national initiative in support of service members and their families, in the East Room at the White House in Washington, April 12, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jim Young

WASHINGTON | Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:39am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Supreme Court took no action Monday on a request to speed up a ruling on President Barack Obama's healthcare overhaul law, his signature domestic accomplishment that has provoked a fierce political battle.

The justices were scheduled on Friday to consider the state of Virginia's appeal seeking to invoke a rarely used procedure to bypass the normal appeals process and speed up a Supreme Court ruling on the law's constitutionality.

Legal and financial analysts expected the justices to reject the request.

In orders released on Monday, the Supreme Court took no action in the case. The court did not grant Virginia's request, nor did it deny it, as the Obama administration has urged.

The justices often take no action in a high-profile case when they want more time to consider it. The justices could consider the healthcare law again at a private conference on April 23.

Several federal trial judges around the nation have upheld the law but others declared it unconstitutional on the grounds Congress overstepped its authority in requiring that Americans start buying health insurance in 2014 or pay a penalty.

If the justices reject Virginia's appeal, that probably would put off Supreme Court review of the law until its 2011-12 term that begins in October, depending on how fast the appeals courts rule. (Reporting by James Vicini, Editing by Doina Chiacu)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
USAPragmatist wrote:
Uh Oh, more facts against a Republican/Tea-Party argument. But hey it is still Obama’s fault that Supreme Court not hear case this year. That is one thing you have to admire about the current group of Republicans, they do not let pesky things like facts stand in the way of their arguments/ideologies.

Apr 18, 2011 11:58am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Sensibility wrote:
There’s no reason for the Supreme Court to treat this case any different than any other case before them. All Supreme Court cases are important, and just because the Obama Administration railroaded an unconstitutional law through Congress against the will of the people without due process, the Supreme Court does not need to change its itinerary to meet the President’s schedule. The nice thing for Republicans is that the ruling will eventually come back to bite Obama no matter the outcome. Even if DOJ wins the case, Obama loses, because the firestorm hits the media right before the 2012 elections, galvanizing opposition support. It’s a beautiful thing.

Apr 18, 2011 11:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.