EU to probe if Internet providers hinder content

Related Topics

BRUSSELS | Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:09pm EDT

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The EU's telecoms chief threatened on Tuesday to impose tougher rules to ensure Internet providers do not discriminate against some content companies such as internet voice call providers like Skype.

Europe has to date adopted a more hands-off policy on net neutrality -- the principle that all internet traffic be treated equally -- compared with U.S. regulators.

But analysts said this is likely to change as competition intensifies between mobile operators and service providers such as Google, Skype or Facebook that offer practically free voice communications and messaging.

Internet providers say they should be free to manage their networks for the benefit of all users, but content providers are worried about disruption of access and anti-competitive behavior.

"The Commission has asked the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) to undertake a rigorous fact-finding exercise on issues crucial to ensuring an open and neutral Internet," EU Commissioner Neelie Kroes said in a statement.

She cited possible barriers including the blocking of internet traffic in areas such as voice over internet.

"If BEREC's findings and other feedback indicate outstanding problems, the Commission will assess the need for more stringent measures," Kroes said.

The European Commission plans to publish the results of BEREC's investigation by the end of the year.

CONSUMER POWER Lobbying group Cable Europe, whose members include Liberty Global, Virgin Media Inc and Kabel BW, said there were already enough safeguards to deter providers from favoring their own services.

"Individual companies that behave anti-competitively can be sanctioned through current provisions in telecoms legislation and competition rules," Cable Europe's managing director Caroline Van Weede said in a statement.

"But, in the end, the sanction of the customer is most swift, given countless social networking tools, blogs and fast-moving web publications."

The European Telecommunications Network Operators' Association, whose members include Telefonica, Orange and Telecom Italia, pointed to the risks of more rules.

"In highly competitive markets for fixed and mobile broadband, any further regulation that would restrict traffic management and service differentiation would undermine Europe's digital economy and hamper innovation," ETNO chairman Luigi Gambardella said in a statement.

Skype said its research showed that a majority of mobile operators in several EU countries discriminated against voice-over-internet services and other users.

"The EU appears to be alone in the developed world in tolerating on such a wide scale these types of arbitrary restrictions on Internet use, put in place by private telecoms operators," Skype's spokesman Sravanthi Agrawal said.

"It has to cease, and we look to European authorities to unambiguously protect consumers and online innovation by stamping out ... such arbitrary restrictions."

European Consumers Organization BEUC criticized the Commission for missing an opportunity to adopt specific rules to protect users.

U.S. communications regulators adopted rules in December last year that banned high-speed Internet service providers from blocking lawful traffic.

(Additional reporting by Georgina Prodhan in London; editing by Charlie Dunmore and Will Waterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
FredericDonck wrote:
The Internet Society heartily endorses its continued emphasis on the importance of the open Internet.

It is this open nature of the “network of networks” that has enabled the Internet to be enjoyed and shaped by increasingly diverse players, from users to network managers to those whose economic competitive edge depends upon it.

When considering how to safeguard Internet neutrality, policy-makers should therefore focus on preserving the open, user-centric Internet model that has been so successful to date.

We welcome the vow by EU Digital Agenda Commissioner Neelie Kroes today ‘to ensure that citizens and business in the EU can enjoy the benefits of an open and neutral Internet, without hidden restrictions and at the speeds promised by their service providers’.

We are also pleased to hear the commissioner uphold the rules of competition as being ‘at the core of the new enhanced telecom rules on transparency, quality of service and the ability to easily switch operators’.

Openness underpins and enables user access, choice, and transparency. These principles are so critical to the success of the Internet that they must be part of present and future policy for the Internet. So, while competition is vital to the open Internet, it must go hand-in-hand with equal commitment to transparency and access.

The Internet Society believes that one of the most important criteria for defining real and effective competition is transparency in service offerings so that users have a choice of Internet service providers and are able to make their informed decisions regarding choice.

Nonetheless, the Internet Society would like to remind the European Commission that it has much work still to do in this area and will need to keep monitoring the situation closely.

Frederic Donck, director of the Internet Society’s European regional bureau

Apr 19, 2011 10:48am EDT  --  Report as abuse
ACT wrote:
ACT has supported the principle of net neutrality from the beginning as our members and their users have come to expect to be able to get to any legal website, via any device, over any ISP, without fear of blocking or discrimination. Most carriers have been persuaded by the wisdom of this approach. Moving forward, great caution should be exercised when it comes to regulation of mobile internet load management and commercial opportunities surrounding excess bandwidth such as higher level service agreements for specialized applications such as medical. Until we get a better understanding of where the technology is going, it makes sense to maintain a wait-and-see approach. If we set the rules in stone too quickly we could end-up deterring rather than incentivising innovation.
Jonathan Zuck, Association for Competitive Technology
www.actonline.org

Apr 19, 2011 1:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.