Libyan ground forces degraded by up to 40 percent: U.S.

BAGHDAD Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:51pm EDT

Related Topics

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Coalition air strikes have degraded Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi's main ground forces by 30 to 40 percent, but the conflict is becoming deadlocked, the top U.S. military officer said on Friday.

"It's certainly moving toward a stalemate," said Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, addressing U.S. troops during a visit to Baghdad.

"At the same time we've attrited (degraded) somewhere between 30 and 40 percent of his main ground forces, his ground force capabilities. Those will continue to go away over time."

He said the fight had become much harder as the Libyan military changed tactics, trying to appear like rebels to avoid being targeted. He said the battle was already "very much stalemate-like in the vicinity of Ajdabiya and Brega."

Mullen, who arrived in Baghdad on Thursday for talks with Iraqi leaders and to visit U.S. troops, said the international consensus was that "Gaddafi's gotta go." But he acknowledged it was unclear how long it might take for that to happen.

"Every single action that countries are taking ... are going to continue to put the squeeze on him until he's gone. Is he going to figure that out? I don't know," Mullen said.

Some U.S. officials have voiced concerns about potential Islamic extremism among opposition forces. The head of the U.S. military's Africa Command told Congress this month that it was the stated intent of al Qaeda's affiliate in the area, al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) to aid Libya's opposition.

But Mullen said there was no sign of al Qaeda representation in Libya's opposition and played down concerns about any militant groups edging their way into the Libyan conflict.

"It certainly doesn't mean, whether it's Libya or in other countries that there aren't leaders in terrorist organisations that aren't looking to try to take advantage of this," Mullen said.

"But we're watchful of it, mindful of it and I just haven't seen much of it at all. In fact, I've seen no al Qaeda representation there at all."

Mullen acknowledged that the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), which waged a failed armed insurgency against Gaddafi's rule in the 1990s, had "stirred a little bit."

"But I haven't seen anything significant at this particular point in time," he said.

The LIFG represented the greatest challenge to Gaddafi in the 90s and made several failed attempts to assassinate the Libyan leader.

(Editing by Serena Chaudhry and Andrew Roche)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
daniwitz13 wrote:
Sure there is ONLY one outcome. Anytime a large group of thugs gang-up on the little guy and tie his hands behind his back to fight, there is Only one outcome in the LONG rum. But with America, nothing is meant to be equal. The mighty ist military don’t fight equals. Take Afghanistan, the people live in mud houses and no socks. We have planes, helicopters, tanks, drones and the best fighting equipment in comparison. We have been there for OVER 10 YEARS, but eventually in 20 years or so, sure we’ll probably win. Who actually cares about tax payers money, certainly NOT Obama or Generals.

Apr 22, 2011 4:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.