Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.

Obama sees no magic bullet to push down gas prices

Employee Josh Watkins changes gas prices on a sign at a Sunoco station in Alexandria, Virginia April 12, 2011. REUTERS/Molly Riley

Employee Josh Watkins changes gas prices on a sign at a Sunoco station in Alexandria, Virginia April 12, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Molly Riley

WASHINGTON | Sat Apr 23, 2011 6:10am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Barack Obama told Americans on Saturday there is no "magic bullet" to bring down high gasoline prices and said he wants to end what he called $4 billion in taxpayer subsidies to oil and gas companies.

Obama is feeling the heat from gasoline prices that are about $4 a gallon and may surge higher. A New York Times-CBS News poll found that 70 percent of Americans believe the country is on the wrong track and analysts believe gas prices are a main reason.

The president devoted his weekly radio and Internet address to outlining his views on the U.S. energy predicament, saying clean energy is ultimately the way forward for a country long addicted to gas-guzzling vehicles.

"Now, whenever gas prices shoot up, like clockwork, you see politicians racing to the cameras, waving three-point plans for $2 gas. You see people trying to grab headlines or score a few points. The truth is, there's no silver bullet that can bring down gas prices right away," he said.

Obama, in the early stages of his 2012 re-election campaign, has been seeing steady improvement in the U.S. economy. But rising gasoline prices are forcing Americans to pay more out of their income, which some fear could harm the fragile economic recovery.

Obama said it is time to eliminate what he called $4 billion in annual "taxpayer subsidies" to oil and gas companies.

"That's $4 billion of your money going to these companies when they're making record profits and you're paying near record prices at the pump. It has to stop," he said.

The Obama administration on Thursday unveiled a working group of federal agencies to probe potential fraud in the energy markets that affects pump prices, including actions by speculators.

RENEWABLE ENERGY

Obama accused Republicans of seeking to cut 70 percent in government spending to encourage development of clean energy projects.

"Instead of subsidizing yesterday's energy sources, we need to invest in tomorrow's. We need to invest in clean, renewable energy," he said.

"Yes, we have to get rid of wasteful spending -- and make no mistake, we're going through every line of the budget scouring for savings. But we can do that without sacrificing our future," he added.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said in response to the president that the Obama administration over the past two years has "declared what can only be described as a war on American energy."

"It's canceled dozens of drilling leases, imposed a moratorium on drilling off the Gulf Coast and increased permit fees. It's done just about everything it can to keep our own energy sector from growing," McConnell said.

McConnell said more must be done to increase domestic oil production.

The comments by Obama and McConnell came three days after the anniversary of the giant BP Plc oil spill off the coast of Louisiana that caused economic and environmental harm to the U.S. Gulf Coast.

(Editing by Will Dunham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (48)
1reuters25 wrote:
Yes there is a “magic” bullet and it could be the shot heard around the world. All the U.S. needs to do is stop spending unconscionable amounts of money on defense. The war on terror is, and always was, financial. Everyone knows the U.S. cannot be defeated militarily, but it can be bankrupted and defeated. Make the military live on $550 billion per year including wars. In fact, the generals can fight as many wars as they want as long as they stay within budget. If the current generals cannot figure out how to do this, find some new generals who can.

Apr 23, 2011 8:17am EDT  --  Report as abuse
smhancoc wrote:
To summarize… When you’re a senator, magic bullets exist. When you’re president, reality kicks in and no magic bullets exist.

Apr 23, 2011 9:07am EDT  --  Report as abuse
deWhit wrote:
To find the magic bullet, B. O. has no furthe to look than to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. All the Commission has to do is change the rules so that commodity traders must prove prior to buying or selling any commodity futures contract, that they, the trader, actually owns or works for an actual brick and mortar business that either produces, consumes, or processes the commodity being traded. Such a rule change would not only bring oil prices down, it would bring prices down for all commodities, allowing America to get back to work. Its a no-brainer!

Apr 23, 2011 9:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.