Missouri sues to block demolition of levee on Mississippi

KANSAS CITY, Mo Tue Apr 26, 2011 5:14pm EDT

Related Topics

KANSAS CITY, Mo (Reuters) - The Missouri attorney general filed a federal lawsuit on Tuesday asking a judge to stop the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' plans to detonate the levee at Birds Point on the Mississippi River.

Attorney General Chris Koster said the Corps, which manages the river, is preparing to intentionally breach the levee in hopes of keeping Cairo, Illinois, from flooding. Koster said demolition of the levee will cause serious flooding across as much as 130,000 acres of Mississippi County, Missouri.

A law enacted in the 1920s requires the Corps to blow up the levee if the gauge at Cairo reaches a certain water level. But Koster believes the law is "unclear" as to whether the Corps actually has the authority to make the decision to detonate.

"There are no 'good' options at this juncture," said Koster in a statement. But he said given the long-term effects of the government's proposal on Missouri citizens, the state wants a review by the federal court.

A spokesperson for the Corps was not immediately available for comment.

Koster said the flooding would leave a layer of silt that could take a generation to clear, causing significant injury to the quality of the farmland. The flooding also would affect 100 homes.

About 100 people have already agreed to voluntarily evacuate Cairo, which is at the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers, according to Cairo Fire Department Captain Brandon Manker.

One problem the area is experiencing is that the Ohio and Mississippi rivers are flooding at the same time, and the Ohio, which usually drains into the bigger river, can't do so, according to Buddy Rogers, spokesman for the Kentucky Division of Emergency Management.

There has been flooding along the Ohio River from Cincinnati to the Mississippi, according to the National Weather Service.

(Additional reporting by Kevin Murphy; Writing by Mary Wisniewski; Editing by Jerry Norton)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
paperburn1 wrote:
I seem to remember flooding restored soil productivity, of cource unless you have a vested interest in that land that will be flooded and will take a loss of income from it becuase you did not renew you flood insurance to save money.

Apr 26, 2011 5:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
urbblurb wrote:
I thought flooding over time was good for farmland.

Apr 26, 2011 5:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Redfish57 wrote:
The Corp of Engineers in Florida made the obscene decision to re-route the Florida Everglades., and we are still suffering the effects many many years later.

Apr 26, 2011 5:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.