Palestinian unity deal puts U.S. funding in question

WASHINGTON Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:11pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The new Palestinian unity deal could imperil hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. aid if it gives a more prominent role to Hamas, the Islamist group that has spurned demands to renounce violence and recognize Israel's right to exist.

After Hamas and the Western-backed Fatah party announced their reconciliation agreement on Wednesday, Democratic and Republican lawmakers in Washington warned U.S. funding could not flow to a government that includes a group still on the U.S. list of foreign terrorist organizations.

"The Palestinian Authority has chosen an alliance with violence and extremism over the democratic values that Israel represents," a bipartisan group of lawmakers said on Thursday after a meeting in Tel Aviv with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, the powerful Republican chairwoman of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee and a staunch defender of Israel, said U.S. law required a halt to support for the Palestinian Authority.

"U.S. taxpayer funds should not and must not be used to support those who threaten U.S. security, our interests and our vital ally, Israel," Ros-Lehtinen said in a statement.

Nita Lowey, the senior Democrat on the House Appropriations subcommittee that approves foreign assistance, said any Palestinian unity deal with an unreformed Hamas "will be a death blow to the peace process."

The Obama administration reacted coolly to the Hamas-Fatah announcement, saying any future Palestinian government must renounce violence, respect past peace agreements and recognize Israel's right to exist.

Hamas, founded on a charter that calls for Israel's destruction and in power in the Gaza Strip since 2007, appeared unlikely to comply with these demands. But it remains unclear exactly what role it might play in a unity arrangement with President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah that governs the West Bank.

But the Palestinian announcement promises to complicate U.S. President Barack Obama's drive to relaunch direct Middle East peace talks, which stalled last year despite Obama calling for a deal by this September to establish a Palestinian state.

BUILDING INSTITUTIONS

The United States has given an average of about $400 million per year to the Palestinian Authority headed by Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, much of it aimed at strengthening governance and security in preparation for eventual statehood.

Total U.S. assistance since 1994 has topped $3.5 billion.

A Congressional Research Service report last year said a potential unity government could drop the development and reform objectives set by the Fayyad administration, which are used as major justifications for current U.S. aid levels.

It also said that as long as Hamas refuses to agree to the basic benchmarks on renouncing violence and accepting Israel, the United States could not legally continue assistance to any unity government of which it is a part.

The questions over Palestinian aid come amid a broader debate over U.S. foreign aid levels, which many Republicans have vowed to cut to help rein in the U.S. budget deficit.

"In the current budget environment, all of our foreign assistance needs to be carefully examined," Kay Granger, the Republican chair of the foreign appropriations subcommittee, said in a statement on Thursday.

"If a power-sharing agreement with a terrorist organization becomes a reality in the Palestinian territories, the U.S. will be forced to reexamine our aid to the Palestinian Authority."

The State Department on Thursday did not immediately respond to questions about Palestinian aid.

Political analysts said the Obama administration will likely move cautiously as it awaits details on the unity deal ahead of a visit by Netanyahu to Washington next month.

Netanyahu has said the Palestinian Authority must choose either peace with Israel or peace with Hamas. But with Palestinians pushing hard for unilateral U.N. recognition of statehood in September, both he and Obama may come under fresh pressure now to find a way back to peace talks.

"We're going to go through a period of unrealism by Israel and the United States, where they are going to say we can't have a unity government which includes Hamas. But I don't think that's going to hold water for very long," said Stephen Cohen, head of the Institute for Middle East Peace and Development.

"The truth is that this is the first opening to some possibility that the Palestinians will be able to negotiate seriously with Israel, with all hands on deck."

(Additional reporting by Susan Cornwell; Editing by John O'Callaghan and Cynthia Osterman)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
sensi wrote:
“Total U.S. assistance since 1994 has topped $3.5 billion.”

That’s what the US is giving every year to the Israeli government, a government full of far-right xenophobes, ultra-nationalists, warmongers, settlers and religious extremists (Shas, etc), yet their is no prerequisite for that money.

These US officials -who are simple and treasonous Israelis assets in the congress and house of representatives- are a complete disgrace to humankind and an insult to our intelligence.

The US is not an honest or impartial broker (see latest UN veto over a resolution condemning Israelis illegal settlements), that’s why it is becoming more and more irrelevant in that matter, a ludicrous buffoon.

Apr 28, 2011 3:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
albertinamel wrote:
sensi – Actually, we give far more than that annually to Israel (it was about $3B in the late 1990s), and you’re right to point out the hypocrisy. Who the “terrorist” is really depends on which side of the wall you live on. As long as it’s unwilling to abide by UN resolutions, I say let Israel fight its own battles w/o my tax money. Israel can defend itself; it has a huge arsenal of nukes and a heavily-armed, top-notch military. Let Israel stand on its own two feet for a change. Meanwhile, Hamas is a legitimately elected representative of the Palestinian people. Any decent democracy would have to concede the need to work with Hamas rather than against it. (Then again, we can’t even get our own Dems & GOP to work together, so I guess it’s not surprising that we don’t endorse a spirit of cooperation in the Palestinian govt.) In short, Americans say we want democracy in the Middle East, but only if it’s to our liking.

Apr 28, 2011 4:04pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
VultureTX wrote:
Sensi- you forgot to add that Israel is a government with a million arab citizens. Whereas HAMAS is a government that has less than 2000 christians citizens and zero jewish. Which is the xenophobe again?

Apr 28, 2011 4:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.