Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.

Jobless claims jump in latest week

Related Topics

A man looks over employment opportunities at a jobs center in San Francisco, California, in this February 4, 2010 file photo. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith/Files

A man looks over employment opportunities at a jobs center in San Francisco, California, in this February 4, 2010 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith/Files

WASHINGTON | Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:46am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New U.S. claims for unemployment benefits surprisingly rose last week to their highest level since January in a sign an anticipated recovery in labor markets may take time, a government report showed on Thursday.

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits jumped 25,000 to a seasonally adjusted 429,000, up from a slightly upwardly revised 404,000 the preceding week, the Labor Department said. Economists polled by Reuters were expecting claims to slip to 392,000 from the previously reported 403,000.

Jobless claims below 400,000 are associated with steady job growth.

The four week moving average, a better measure of underlying trends, climbed to 408,500 from 399,250 in the previous week. It was the highest for the four-week average since February.

The number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid tumbled a more-than-expected 68,000 in the week ended April 16 to 3.64 million, the lowest level since September, 2008. Analysts anticipated a drop in continued claims to 3.68 million.

(Reporting by Mark Felsenthal, Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
PHenry13 wrote:
Let’s all stick our heads in the sand and pretend that this has nothing to do with outsourcing or the abuse of the h-1b visa program. Companies cut 2.9 million jobs in the U.S. during the 2000′s while increasing jobs overseas by 2.4 million. Yet you’d be hard pressed to hear any coverage of this in the mainstream media.

Apr 28, 2011 9:21am EDT  --  Report as abuse
skeeteril wrote:
Slightly Revise This…..You are being lied to and screwed by the Fed.

Apr 28, 2011 10:08am EDT  --  Report as abuse
minuteman wrote:
Of course unemployment rose and will continue to rise because Obama has no domestic policy to deal with it, except wealth redistribution and slamming businesses that hire people and expand the economy. Obama’s socialist ideology is in direct conflict with the basic principles of a free market system. His Bolshevik mentalilty does not mesh with the free spirit of risk; business management; and only produces disincentives if you are a capitalist.
Higher taxes and undisciplined spending is resulting in Americans taking home less spendable money and now with the absence of a domestic energy policy that includes shutting down oil;coal; gas production, the American people will have even less to take home. Prepare for businesses to lay off even more people because of the increased costs of doing business and prepare to have people quiting their jobs because they can’t afford to pay for the gas it takes to get to work.

Apr 28, 2011 12:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.