Clean energy source shows dark side in U.S. tornadoes

CHICAGO Sun May 1, 2011 6:43pm EDT

Tracy Hannah reacts after returning to her house for the first time since a tornado swept through the Alberta community near Tuscaloosa, Alabama, April 29, 2011. REUTERS/Marvin Gentry

Tracy Hannah reacts after returning to her house for the first time since a tornado swept through the Alberta community near Tuscaloosa, Alabama, April 29, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Marvin Gentry

Related Topics

CHICAGO (Reuters) - The deadly tornadoes that tore across the South last week highlighted the cruel and ruthless side of wind, an energy source championed as an earth-friendly alternative to fossil fuels.

Wind industry experts say their business was largely unaffected by the worst U.S. tornado disaster since 1925, because the twisters carved their destructive path through a part of the country with almost no wind farms.

But turbines in states where twisters are common are designed to take defensive action when the benign resource they harvest turns dangerous.

"We do have safeguards against really super high winds, especially those in the Midwest," Andrew Longeteig, a spokesman for Vestas, one of the biggest turbine makers.

Wind farms, found in 38 of the 50 U.S. states, work best when air currents blow between 25 and 50 miles an hour, and the intense, volatile gusts of tornadoes can be damaging.

"Wind that screams on one day and doesn't blow the next isn't what we are looking for," said Steve Stengel, spokesman for NextEra Energy Resources, the No. 1 U.S. producer of wind energy.

Even winds stronger than 55 miles an hour are bad for a turbine and create wear and tear on complex components.

"It isn't worth it," said Paul Copleman, a spokesman for Iberdrola Renewables, the No. 2 U.S. producer.

Turbines evaluate wind speed and direction on their own and shut down automatically if currents become too fast, he said.

They are designed to cut out when their onboard anemometers begin to register winds that exceed their so-called survival speed, typically about 130 miles an hour and well below the 200 mile an hour winds in Hackleburg, Alabama last week.

When wind hitting the blades is faster than the survival speed, it destroys the internal workings of the turbine and can do serious damage to the blades, Copleman said.

Data centers in Oregon and elsewhere that remotely operate the turbines also monitor the National Weather Service and other meteorological sources closely.

When a tornado watch turns into a warning, meaning a twister has been spotted or is imminent, remote operators can shut down turbines and angle the blades to catch as little wind as possible.

The brunt of last week's devastation occurred in Alabama and Mississippi where there are no commercial wind farms at all, according to the American Wind Energy Association.

But the largest death toll from tornadoes took place in 1925, when 747 people were killed in Missouri, Illinois and Indiana -- states that today are big players in the wind industry, with hundreds of turbines generating thousands of megawatts of electricity.

Longeteig said only time will tell if those farms are prepared for the kind of tornadoes that ripped through the South. Two of them were classified as Category 5 on the Enhanced Fujita Scale, the most powerful of all with winds in excess of 200 miles per hour.

Longeteig said the performance of turbines in Japan in the aftermath of the recent earthquake gave him confidence that wind farms in the Midwest would be able to survive.

"There was no damage, and they were still producing power without any downtime," he said.

"Obviously, there's always weather challenges in the Midwest, with tornadoes and flooding and severe weather in the winter," he added. "But these things are built for it."

(Reporting by James B. Kelleher, editing by Ellen Wulfhorst)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
NanooGeek wrote:
Last couple of comments by Longeteig don’t seem very relevant, for several reasons:
1) Commercial wind turbines must be feathered, far below tornadic wind speeds,
2) Even if a way can be found to capture power from tornadoes, powerlines will be down (unless buried, but then they could be at risk from earthquakes).

While capturing tornadic power does not seem likely in the forseeable future, swarms of semi-autonomous UAVs (… which was a plot element in a TV disaster movies, not that long ago) might someday disrupt airflow where the tornado is gathering strength…

May 01, 2011 7:44pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Tamooj wrote:
Really? I mean, did you REALLY just write this?
What a parasitic piece of tripe.
The insipid use of anthropomorphism, (‘wind’ has a ‘dark side’? WTF?)
and there is the non-connections to the recent tornadoes in a place where there are no wind farms, and then the far out stretch about windmills in Japan not being hurt by the earthquake there…
Huh?

Sigh.

May 01, 2011 9:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
kittensteak wrote:
This is the most misleading title for an article I have seen in a long time. After reading the title I expected to read about how turbines are somehow dangerous in bad weather and they caused death and/or destruction during recent storms.
I can’t possibly imagine what the placement and operation of turbines has to do with this title.

May 01, 2011 11:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus