Pakistan's Zardari: bin Laden raid was not joint operation

Related Interactive

Pakistan's President Asif Ali Zardari speaks to journalists after a meeting with France's President Nicolas Sarkozy at the Elysee Palace in Paris in this August 2, 2010 file photo. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier

Pakistan's President Asif Ali Zardari speaks to journalists after a meeting with France's President Nicolas Sarkozy at the Elysee Palace in Paris in this August 2, 2010 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Benoit Tessier

WASHINGTON | Mon May 2, 2011 11:02pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The killing of Osama bin Laden by U.S. forces was not a joint operation with Pakistan, the president of Pakistan said in an opinion column published on Monday.

President Asif Ali Zardari, writing in the Washington Post, also dismissed any notion that Pakistan was failing to take action against militants on its territory.

Zardari said the whereabouts of the al Qaeda leader, killed in a town some two hours north of Islamabad, were not known to the Pakistani authorities.

"He was not anywhere we had anticipated he would be, but now he is gone," he wrote.

"Although the events of Sunday were not a joint operation, a decade of cooperation and partnership between the United States and Pakistan led up to the elimination of Osama bin Laden as a continuing threat to the civilized world."

The Pakistani leader said it was simply untrue to suggest that his country, as badly hit as any by bin Laden and his militants with 30,000 civilian deaths, was sluggish or unwilling to track down activists.

Even within hours of the operation that killed bin Laden, U.S. lawmakers were asking how he had been able to live in a populated area of Pakistan without anyone in authority knowing about it, possibly for years. Some said it was time to review the billions in aid the United States provides Pakistan.

"Some in the U.S. press have suggested that Pakistan lacked vitality in its pursuit of terrorism or, worse yet, that we were disingenuous and actually protected the terrorists we claimed to be pursuing," he wrote.

"Such baseless speculation may make exciting cable news, but it doesn't reflect fact. Pakistan had as much reason to despise al-Qaeda as any nation. The war on terrorism is as much Pakistan's war as it is America's. And though it may have started with bin Laden, the forces of modernity remain under serious threat."

(Writing by John Chalmers; Editing by Ron Popeski.)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Bob_Andersen wrote:
Pakistan gave the GB detainees to the US, even if the US go their intelligence information from their detainees

May 02, 2011 11:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Bob_Andersen wrote:
Pakistan captured the GB detainees and handed over the US. America go their intelligence from the detainees. So it becomes a joint effort in that sense.

May 02, 2011 11:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Why didn’t the Pakistani police or army show up while there was a 40 minute battle going on in an urban area 30 miles away from the capital? The explosions could be heard for miles.. Someone had to have told them not to intervene or there would be dead Pakistani police and/or military.

May 02, 2011 12:38am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.