GE's Immelt wishes he had soft-pedaled green talk

BOSTON | Tue May 3, 2011 6:13pm EDT

BOSTON (Reuters) - General Electric Co may have grown its clean-tech business fourfold over the past six years, but Chief Executive Jeff Immelt wishes he had spent a little less time talking about it.

The head of the largest U.S. conglomerate, who in January was named a top adviser on job creation to U.S. President Barack Obama, said on Tuesday that GE's focus on the environmentally friendly aspects of its wind turbines and high-efficiency appliances might have led his critics to believe he was more interested in saving the planet than growing the company.

"If I had one thing to do over again I would not have talked so much about green," Immelt said at an event sponsored by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "Even though I believe in global warming and I believe in the science ... it just took on a connotation that was too elitist; it was too precious and it let opponents think that if you had a green initiative, you didn't care about jobs. I'm a businessman. That's all I care about, is jobs."

As investors pour more money into energy technologies such as solar panels and wind turbines, which produce electricity without releasing the carbon dioxide associated with global climate change, the renewable energy and smart-grid industries will generate some 10 million to 15 million new jobs worldwide, 3 million of 5 million of which should be in the United States, Immelt said.

The company's Ecomagination initiative, which also encompasses products such as energy-efficient jet engines and railway locomotives, will generate some $21 billion in revenue this year, Immelt said. That is more than four times the $5 billion recorded in 2005, but less than the $25 billion by 2010 goal the Fairfield, Connecticut-based company set in 2009.

Immelt, who often points out in speeches that he has never been camping as a way of downplaying his environmental interests, said he has lost interest in calling on the United States to develop a more comprehensive energy policy. His prior calls that the nation adopt regulations that put a price on carbon raised the hackles of some shareholders.

"I'm kind of over the stage of arguing for a comprehensive energy policy. I'm back to keeping my head down and working," Immelt said.

But he could not resist wading into the debate around Massachusetts' proposed Cape Wind project, which could be the nation's first offshore wind farm, although opponents in the nearby Cape Cod resort area have complained it would sully their views.

"I have a lot of friends that have houses on the Cape and on Nantucket, and I say build those big turbines there," Immelt said.

Those words came despite the fact the Cape Wind turbines will come from one of GE's largest rivals -- Siemens AG.

(Reporting by Scott Malone; editing by Andre Grenon)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
pyeatte wrote:
Part of the problem with agenda based economics is the claim of millions of “new” renewable energy jobs. They never ask the question “how many jobs will be “lost” trying to create the agenda jobs?”. One thing for sure, the so-called “new jobs” will be lower paying and fewer than those lost. Lets assume we are having global warming (and that is very questionable), stating that humans are the cause is based 100% on politics, not science. Do we have climate change? absolutly, the climate is always changing and has been changing for millions/billions of years.

May 05, 2011 2:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
teapartydoc wrote:
He’s beginning to realize that he is going to be a target, not a client, of the next US government. Keep that head waaaayyy down, Jeffie.

May 06, 2011 8:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
JWnTX wrote:
Yeah-it will create 10-15 million new jobs. As long as the government continues to subsidize this stupidity. Once “green” has to stand on its own, it will fail miserably. We’ve been subsidizing green technology for over 30 years and it hasn’t even reached 1% of our energy needs. We need people who THINK in government–not ideologues.

May 06, 2011 8:17am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.