Infants getting herbal remedies, despite questions

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Tue May 3, 2011 2:22pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Parents commonly give infants teas or herbal supplements said to soothe "fussiness," even though there's no good evidence that the products work, a U.S. government study finds.

There are a number of teas and botanical products with ingredients like chamomile, ginger and fennel that are marketed for easing infants' tummy troubles, fussiness and sleep issues.

The problem is there is little evidence that they work, or that they are completely safe.

In the new study published Monday, Dr. Yuanting Zhang and colleagues at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) wanted to find out how common it is for parents to give infants tea or herbal products.

Surveying more than 2,600 U.S. mothers, they found that 9 percent had given their baby at least one of those products in the first year of life.

The products included teas with chamomile or other herbs said to soothe; gripe water, a botanical marketed for easing colic that includes ingredients like ginger and fennel; and "teething tablets," which may contain ingredients like calcium and chamomile.

Mothers most often said they used the products to help with their babies' fussiness, colic, digestion or teething, the FDA team reports in the journal Pediatrics.

But whether the products actually work as advertised is another matter.

A recent review of 15 studies, also published in Pediatrics, found scant support for using herbal extracts, sugar water or digestion-aiding "probiotics" for colic.

Infants are considered "colicky" if they are healthy but cry excessively -- for more than about 3 hours per day. Colic is very common, and usually disappears after the first few months of life.

Experts often recommend that parents try tactics like giving their colicky infants smaller, more frequent feedings, or more touch and attention. But there are no products known to ease colic.

Because dietary supplements are not regulated in the same way drugs are, they do not have to be proven safe and effective before they go on store shelves.

They may also contain contaminants, like heavy metals, that could be particularly unsafe for infants, according to the FDA researchers.

There have been cases, they note, in which infants and adults have been poisoned by contaminants in alternative-medicine products, including traditional Indian Ayurvedic remedies tainted with lead.

And even if the products are safe, Zhang's team writes, experts generally recommend that babies receive only breast milk or infant formula for the first 4 to 6 months of life. Giving babies tea or other liquids may dampen their desire for the nutrient-rich milk that they need.

In general, experts recommend against giving infants any medications or supplements without talking with your pediatrician first.

SOURCE: bit.ly/jsN8aW Pediatrics, online May 2, 2011.

SOURCE: Pediatrics 2011;

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
My comment is an observation about what researchers here and any other article suggest when this subject arises.

#1 Are any of these individuals actually parents or caregivers of a child? Yes, we read the label and try a product the first time. We must take the manufacturer’s “word” for what is on that label. But after that first time, if it did not work, do you think we keep feeding it to the kid like candy or something? If it did not work, we go find something else. If it did seem to make an improvement, then yes, we have just affirmed to ourselves that we may trust that manufacturer and his product. So why do these researchers spend so much time and energy trying to downplay any effectiveness of alternative therapies, when I do not consistently see articles daily downplaying the effectiveness and toxicity of pharmaceutical therapies.

And that leads me to my second observation:

#2 If we as the general consumer would actually know most of what is used as “fillers” in all of the cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, foods, toiletries, vaccines, plastics, herbicides, pesticides, building materials and on and on – we would probably believe we can no longer safely eat, sleep, brush our teeth, take a shower, watch the TV in our recliner, take our life-saving drugs and again this list can go on and on.

Please do not insult our intelligence by suggesting the safety and effectiveness of a man-made chemical concoction is far superior to using a plant or herb which has been used safely for thousands and thousands of years. Sure, if we use the incorrect plant we will not receive any noticeable health improvement. But guess what, if I took a pill for diabetes, it’s not going to help my broken arm also.

For some suggestions to help control allergy symptoms by combining the effectiveness of BOTH kinds of medicine, please see my website at www.allergiesandalternativemedicine.com

May 04, 2011 4:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.