Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

No resistance in "cold-blooded" U.S. raid: Pakistan officials

Related Topics

Related Video

Wreckage is seen in the compound after U.S. Navy SEAL commandos killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, May 2, 2011. REUTERS/Stringer

Wreckage is seen in the compound after U.S. Navy SEAL commandos killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, May 2, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Stringer

ABBOTTABAD, Pakistan | Thu May 5, 2011 8:18am EDT

ABBOTTABAD, Pakistan (Reuters) - Osama bin Laden and his comrades offered no resistance when killed by U.S. special forces in a Pakistani town, Pakistani security officials said on Thursday.

U.S. accounts of what happened have changed throughout the week, and initial characterizations of a 40-minute gun battle have given way to officials being quoted as saying only one of the five people who were killed had been armed.

The White House has cited the "fog of war" as a reason for initial misinformation on whether bin Laden -- who was shot in the head -- was armed when U.S. Navy SEALs raided his compound in the Pakistani town of Abbottabad early on Monday.

Two senior Pakistani security officials, citing their investigation, said there was no firefight because the inhabitants never fired back.

"The people inside the house were unarmed. There was no resistance," one of the officials said.

"It was cold-blooded," said the second official when asked if there was any exchange of fire during the operation which, U.S. officials said lasted nearly 40 minutes.

The officials declined to say how they got their information, but officials had earlier said wounded had been detained.

Photographs acquired by Reuters and taken about an hour after the assault show three dead men -- not including bin Laden -- lying in pools of blood. No weapons could be seen in the closely cropped images.

The photos, taken by a Pakistani security official who was in the compound after the raid, show two men dressed in traditional Pakistani garb and one in a T-shirt, blood streaming from their ears, noses and mouths.

($1 = 84.750 Pakistani Rupees)

(Editing by Chris Allbritton and Nick Macfie)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (44)
jblee726 wrote:
How could there be weapons when these were taken for fingerprint analysis and evidence to identify the people who are in the house with the primary target? No need to take Bin Ladin’s Ak-47 and pistol because the raiding party already took his body. I’m sure that when the people heard or awaken by the sounds of helicopters they knew that they were under attack and they certainly try to defend themselves.

May 05, 2011 8:01am EDT  --  Report as abuse
chip299 wrote:
The last I checked, none of the 3,000 people in the World Trade Center were armed either.

May 05, 2011 8:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
pistonxx11 wrote:
Someone help me out with this:
1. Four helicopters land (OK, sort of quietly) and an Indian guy a mile away tweets about the noise…
2. SEALS kill a couple of people with gunshots while working their way up to Bin Ladin’s floor…
3. …and Bin Ladin doesn’t have a gun in his hand when the SEALS arrive at his door…? Is he deaf or something?

May 05, 2011 8:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.